Distance between 2 atoms in a crystal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nemo's
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Crystal
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 9K views
Nemo's
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a crystal (cube) with regularly arranged atoms (Total 27 atoms)
The mass of each atom is 3.5*10^-25. The density of the crystal is 9.2*10^3
What is the shortest distance between the centres of two adjacent atoms?

Homework Equations



density = mass / volume

The Attempt at a Solution



Volume= (27*3.5*10^-25)/(9.2*10^3)=1.03*10^-27
Length(L)=1*10-9
Distance between two atoms is L/2=5.04*10^-10
Correct answer is 3.4*10^-9
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you thinkthis is the correct answer?
 
I think your "correct answer" is off by 10
 
L is correct. Should you really be dividing by 2?
 
Sorry the correct answer should be 3.4*10^-10
Should I divide by 3 then ? Why ?
 
What you probably did was to assume the volume of 27 atoms had an atom at every corner and one between. But if you put this volume next to another, the atoms on the edges would be to close. In fact, the distance should be 3.
 
barryj said:
But if you put this volume next to another, the atoms on the edges would be to close.
So the atoms on the edges would be closer than others and that's the required "shortest distance"?
I just can't really imagine what it looks like
 
Maybe I wasn't clear. Put the atoms in a uniform rectangular three dimensional grid. My attachment shows the top view. Notice the volume is (3d)^3
 

Attachments

  • x120.jpg
    x120.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 1,071
The difficulty is, what does volume (and therefore density) mean when applied to a crystal consisting of only 27 atoms? It does not say that the density given is for arbitrarily large chunks of this material - it is for specifically this crystal of 27 atoms. So I tend to agree with Nemo's answer.
 
Good point, I guess whoever stated the "correct answer" thought it was for a large chunk.