[PoM] Electrons Fermi level in a crystal

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the Fermi level and work function for electrons in a one-dimensional hypothetical crystal of Cesium, characterized by a specific dispersion law. The problem involves concepts from solid-state physics, particularly related to band theory and electron behavior in crystals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the density of states and the implications of the one-dimensional nature of the crystal on the k-space. Questions arise regarding the correct treatment of boundary conditions and the relationship between k and the length of the crystal.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the calculations of k_F and the density of states. Some participants express confusion about the implications of a one-dimensional system, while others suggest clarifying the allowed values of k and the corresponding calculations. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of boundary conditions and the dimensionality of k-space in their calculations. There is also mention of the need to consider the specific characteristics of the hypothetical crystal and its implications for the dispersion law.

BRN
Messages
107
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


The conduction band of a hypothetical crystal of one-dimensional Cesium reticular with step a=300 pm (1 atom per cell) is characterized by the ε dispersion law
##\epsilon (k) = V_0 + \frac{\hbar^2}{m_e}(\frac{1}{2}k^2 - \frac{a}{3\pi}|k|^3##
where ##V_0 = -4 eV##, is set so that the energy of a stationary electron in a vacuum on the outside of the crystal appears ε = 0. At zero temperature, determine the position of the Fermi level of the electrons of this crystal (one electron per atom in the conduction band) and the value of the work function. A finite temperature (but small compared to the Fermi temperature) the chemical potential is greater or less than the Fermi level?

The Attempt at a Solution


The Fermi energy level is the highest occupied level in an fermions system at T=0. The dispersion law describes the shape of the conduction band and the Fermi level corresponds to ##\epsilon (k_F)##.
Then, I determine density of states ##g(k)## differentiating with respect k the number of states with wave vector ≥ k (which corresponds to the volume of a sphere of radius
##|\vec{n}|=\frac{V^{1/3}}{2\pi}|\vec{k}|##

##g(k)=g_s\frac{d}{dk}(\frac{4}{3}\pi \frac{V}{8\pi^3}k^3=g_s\frac{V}{2\pi}k^2##

Total number of electrons is:

##N=\int_{0}^{k_F}g(k) dk=\int_{0}^{k_F}g_s\frac{V}{2\pi}k^2 dk=g_s\frac{V}{6\pi^2}k_F^3##

with ##g_s=2##, I have:

##k_F=(3\pi^2\frac{N}{V})^{1/3}##

Crystaline structure is an simple cubic cell, then

##\frac{N}{V}=\frac{1/8*8}{a^3}=\frac{1}{a^3}##

so, ##k_F=1.0312*10^{10}[m^{-1}]##

and ##\epsilon (k_F)=-4.1704*10^{-19}[J]=-2.6023[eV]##

Work function is the minimum energy for extract an electron from metal and is the opposite of Fermi energy:

##W=-\epsilon (k_F)=2.6023[eV]##

Solutions: ##\epsilon_F = -3.304 eV##; W = 3.304 eV; μ remains constant (neither increases nor decreases), since the band dispersion happens to be symmetric around the Fermi point.

What is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BRN said:
Then, I determine density of states ##g(k)## differentiating with respect k the number of states with wave vector ≥ k (which corresponds to the volume of a sphere of radius
##|\vec{n}|=\frac{V^{1/3}}{2\pi}|\vec{k}|##

##g(k)=g_s\frac{d}{dk}(\frac{4}{3}\pi \frac{V}{8\pi^3}k^3=g_s\frac{V}{2\pi}k^2##
In this exercise, you are dealing with a hypothetical one-dimensional crystal. So, what is the dimension of the corresponding k-space?
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
In this exercise, you are dealing with a hypothetical one-dimensional crystal. So, what is the dimension of the corresponding k-space?
k-space is one-dimensional too, I think...

But, at this point, I can not understand how to proceed...
In one-demensional case how to calculate ##k_F##?
 
BRN said:
k-space is one-dimensional too, I think...
Yes.

But, at this point, I can not understand how to proceed...
In one-demensional case how to calculate ##k_F##?
You will need to consider the allowed values of k for the 1D case. Then you can find g(k).
 
In 1-D case are allowed values of ##k=\pm n \frac{\pi}{a}##
Then:

##|n|=\frac{a}{\pi}k##

but, if I derive it with respect to k, I lose the dependence on k...
 
BRN said:
In 1-D case are allowed values of ##k=\pm n \frac{\pi}{a}##
This is not quite correct. Instead of ##a## , shouldn't the relevant distance be the length ##L## of the crystal?

Also, it is important to specify the type of boundary conditions that you are using. Since you are allowing ##k## to be both positive and negative, it appears that you are using periodic boundary conditions. You have to be very careful not to be off by a factor of 2 somewhere.

but, if I derive it with respect to k, I lose the dependence on k...
For the 1D case, g(k) is independent of k.
 
Sorry but, I'm lost...

I have a dispersion law depends on k and Fermi level is ##\epsilon_F(k=k_F)##.
If in 1-D case the density of states is independent of k, then g(k) what would be the use?
 
Even though g(k) is independent of k, you can still formally use g(k) to find kF just as you would for 3D (see your integral for N in your first post ). However, in the 1D case, it is easy to find ##k_F## without introducing g(k) once you have the correct allowed values for ##k## in terms of the integer ##n## and the length ##L## of the crystal. Note that ##L = Na##, which is helpful if you want to express ##k_F## in terms of ##a##.
 
Ok, maybe I understood.

In 1-D case are allowed value of ##k=n\frac{\pi}{L}## with ##n=\pm 1; \pm 2; \pm 3; ...##
I determine the density of states g(k) differentiating with respect k the number of states with wave vector ≥ k, that corresponds to portion of the length

##n=\frac{L}{\pi}k##

##g(k)=g_s\frac{d}{dk}(\frac{L}{\pi}k)=g_s\frac{2L}{\pi}##

with ##g_s=2 \rightarrow## 2 values of spin allower for each k.

Now, number of states within in Fermi region is:

##N=\int_{0}^{k_F}g(k) dk=\int_{0}^{k_F}\frac{2L}{\pi} dk=\frac{2L}{\pi}k_F##

##\Rightarrow k_F=\frac{N}{L}\frac{\pi}{2}##

There is one atom for cell, so (##L=Na##):

##\frac{N}{L}=\frac{N}{Na}=\frac{1}{a}##

then,

##k_F=\frac{\pi}{2a}##

From dispersion law, Fermi level is:

##\epsilon(k=k_F)=V_0+ \frac{\hbar^2}{m_e}(\frac{1}{2}k_F^2 - \frac{a}{3\pi}|k_F|^3)=-6.3999*10^{-19}[J]=-3.9935 [eV]##

and the work function is:

##W=-\epsilon(k_F)=3.9935 [eV]##

I'm closer to the solution.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K