Distance between maxima of two-slit interference

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a two-slit interference experiment where a light of wavelength 500 nm creates a pattern on a screen. The distance between the first minimum and fourth minimum is given as 1.68 cm, and the task is to find the distance between the central maximum and the first order maximum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the path difference and relate it to the distances between minima and maxima, questioning the sufficiency of the given information. Some participants question the relevance of the wavelength and whether the distances between minima and maxima are equivalent.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the relationships between the distances of minima and maxima, with some clarifying that there is a minimum between the central maximum and the first order maximum. There is an acknowledgment that the distances may vary as one moves away from the center, but the relevance of this to the problem remains uncertain.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of explicit information regarding the distance between the slits and the screen, which may affect the calculations. Participants are also considering the implications of the wavelength in the context of the problem.

PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A light of wavelength 500 nm interferes through a two slit experiment on a screen. The distance between the first minimum and fourth minimum is 1.68 cm. Find the distance between the central maximum and first order maximum.

Homework Equations


d*sin(θ) = nλ = Δ

d = distance between slits
Δ = path difference

sin(θ) = tan(θ)
tan(θ) = x / L

x = distance between orders
L = distance between slits and screen

The Attempt at a Solution



We can find the path difference between the first and fourth minimum by:

(3.5)λ which is 0.000175 cm. (I converted 500 nm to 0.00005 cm).

So we can get: ##\frac{0.000175 cm}{d} = \frac{1.68 cm}{L} = tan(θ_1) = sin(θ_1)##.

We need to find: ##\frac{0.00005 cm}{d} = \frac{x}{L} = tan(θ_2) = sin(θ_2)##

But it doesn't look like we have enough information. How can I solve this? Can I use the ratio d / L to set the equation ##\frac{0.000175}{1.68} = \frac{0.00005}{x}##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Things to think about: Does the wavelength of 500 nm really matter? is the distance between minimums the same as between maximums? Is the first order max next to the central max?"
 
barryj said:
Things to think about: Does the wavelength of 500 nm really matter? is the distance between minimums the same as between maximums? Is the first order max next to the central max?"

I found the distance between minimums is larger than the distancce between maximums. And no, the first order max is not next to the central max because they are separated by a minimum
 
Of course there is a minimum between the central max and the first order max. If you look at the pattern, I think you would see a central bright line, then a dark line, then another bright line, then a dark line and etc, yes. As I recall, the distances get a little larger as you move further away from the center but I doubt this is of concern here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K