Distance between planes in crystals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephan Hoyer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystals Planes
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the formula for the distance between parallel planes in crystal structures, specifically in the context of powder X-ray diffraction for cubic lattices. The original poster is seeking a clear derivation of the relationship between the distance (d), cell edge length (a), and Miller indices (hkl), as well as a simpler proof for a two-dimensional square lattice.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their attempts to understand the geometric relationships in a two-dimensional lattice and expresses difficulty in deriving the formula from first principles. They inquire about hints or resources for a derivation.
  • One participant suggests a resource link, while another provides a brief outline of a potential proof involving trigonometric relationships and the geometry of planes.
  • There is a mention of visual aids that may help clarify the concepts discussed.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and resources. Some guidance has been offered regarding the derivation process, and there appears to be a productive exchange of ideas, though no consensus has been reached on a definitive method.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has access to various texts on X-ray diffraction but finds them lacking in clear derivations. They are working within the constraints of an introductory course on modern physics.

Stephan Hoyer
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a lab report on powder X-ray diffraction off of some relatively straight-forward crystals (Si, NaCl, CsCl) for an introductary course on modern physics.

I thought it would be useful to include a partial derivation of the formula relating the distance between parallel planes, d, the length of a cell edge, a, and the miller indices (hkl) for a cubic lattice:

d_{hkl} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}}

I would be happy (and it would be sufficient for my purposes) to do a basic derivation of the spacing between lines in a hypothetical two dimensional square lattice. I've thought a lot about this problem, however, and what I thought would be a clear geometrical fact is turning out to be not so obvious.

Does anyone have any hints or links to a derivation? I got several texts on X-ray diffraction from my college's library, including a text, "Interpretation of x-ray powder diffraction patterns" but none of them include a clear derivation. What I've found online seems to be generally cursory, as well. I've drawn out a two dimensional square lattice and sample parallel lines going through it and I can see that the equation holds, but I'd like a simple proof, from first principles if possible.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stephan Hoyer said:
I'm working on a lab report on powder X-ray diffraction off of some relatively straight-forward crystals (Si, NaCl, CsCl) for an introductary course on modern physics.

I thought it would be useful to include a partial derivation of the formula relating the distance between parallel planes, d, the length of a cell edge, a, and the miller indices (hkl) for a cubic lattice:

d_{hkl} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}}

I would be happy (and it would be sufficient for my purposes) to do a basic derivation of the spacing between lines in a hypothetical two dimensional square lattice. I've thought a lot about this problem, however, and what I thought would be a clear geometrical fact is turning out to be not so obvious.

Does anyone have any hints or links to a derivation? I got several texts on X-ray diffraction from my college's library, including a text, "Interpretation of x-ray powder diffraction patterns" but none of them include a clear derivation. What I've found online seems to be generally cursory, as well. I've drawn out a two dimensional square lattice and sample parallel lines going through it and I can see that the equation holds, but I'd like a simple proof, from first principles if possible.

Thanks for your help.
I am not sure if this helps you but have a look at http://www.eserc.stonybrook.edu/ProjectJava/Bragg/"

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I couldn't find it there with a quick look. So, anyway, it's short enough that I can write it down in a few lines.

Consider two adjacent planes, one of which goes through the origin. The second plane makes intercepts a/h, b/k, c/l (by definition of the Miller Indices). Let the point on this plane that's nearest the origin (O) be P. Then OP is the required d-spacing.

Let the line OP make angles A, B and C with each of the three axes. From trig, we have cos2(A)+cos2(B)+cos2(C)=1
But cos(A) = OP/OX = d/(a/h) = dh/a

Similarly, plug in for cos(B) and cos(C) and you will get the required result.
 
Thanks for you help. It looks like the general proof isn't actually so tedius after all, so I guess I'll include that instead.
 
Really Thanks. Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K