Distance formula in hyperbolic metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the hyperbolic distance formula for the upper-half plane model, specifically addressing the transition to the arccosh function. The user initially struggles with hyperbolic trigonometric functions and their integration. Key insights include the importance of hyperbolic identities and the relationship between arccosh and logarithmic functions. A suggestion is made to utilize Mobius transformations for a more intuitive understanding of hyperbolic geometry, which can simplify the process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperbolic trigonometric functions
  • Familiarity with the upper-half plane model of hyperbolic geometry
  • Basic knowledge of integration techniques
  • Concept of Mobius transformations in complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study hyperbolic trigonometric identities in depth
  • Learn about the derivation of the arccosh function
  • Explore integration techniques involving logarithmic functions
  • Research Mobius transformations and their applications in hyperbolic geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, students studying hyperbolic geometry, and anyone interested in the applications of hyperbolic trigonometric functions.

elffry
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm trying to derive the hyperbolic distance formula for the upper-half plane model.
It is given here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_half-plane_model"

I have the first formula, (ds)2= ...
But I can't figure out how they got the distance formula below it.

I understand the integral of ds is the distance, but I don't know how they got to arccosh. I've never dealt with hyperbolic trig functions before, so I wonder if that's where I'm running into trouble. I've looked up the hyperbolic trig identities, but I'm unable to get something that when integrated, would result in arccosh. I've also tried taking the derivative of the arccosh function, but I'm not completely sure which variable I should be deriving with respect to.

Please a little advice to get me pointed in the right direction!
:smile:
Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look up the trig identitites again. arccosh identifies with a rather complicated log function. The log comes from the y^2 in the demoninator of the path length. If you take the derivative of that log function you should be able to work backwards and see how it works out, but it looks like it will be extremely messy.

I have to say that you can get a much better feel for hyperbolic geometry, and also avoid ugly calculus, if you treat the upper half plane as a complex plane and use Mobius transformations to find lengths, but this might be tangential to what you're trying to do.
 
[SOLVED]

Thanks,

turns out, I needed to take the hyperbolic cosine of a completely different formula and work from there. Thanks though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K