Metric in polar coordinate derivation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the metric in polar coordinates, specifically in the context of hyperbolic geometry. Lenny introduces the metric as d(tau)^2 = ρ^2 dω^2 - dρ^2, which is the hyperbolic equivalent of the Cartesian metric dS^2 = ρ^2 dθ^2 + dρ^2. The conversation clarifies that the Cartesian version does not equal d(tau)^2 but rather represents the Euclidean distance in polar coordinates. A detailed derivation is provided, demonstrating how to convert from Cartesian to polar coordinates using the distance formula in 2D space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar and Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Familiarity with basic calculus and differentiation
  • Knowledge of Euclidean geometry and distance formulas
  • Concept of hyperbolic geometry and its metrics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euclidean distance formula in polar coordinates
  • Explore hyperbolic geometry metrics and their applications
  • Learn about coordinate transformations in multivariable calculus
  • Investigate the implications of polar coordinates in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in the applications of polar coordinates in geometry and calculus.

DiracPool
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
514
At time 1:11:20, Lenny introduces the metric for ordinary flat space in the hyperbolic version of polar coordinates? Is that what he is doing here?

d(tau)^2 = ρ^2 dω^2 - dρ^2.

He then goes on to say that this metric is the hyperbolic version of the same formula for Cartesian space, i. e.,

ρ^2 dθ^2 + dρ^2

My question is what does the Cartesian version equal? It cannot equal d(tau)^2. Does it equal dS^2? That is,

dS^2 = ρ^2 dθ^2 + dρ^2

And what is this telling us? Is it the formula for the distance between 2 points on a Cartesian plane in polar coordinates? I looked for a derivation of this formula online and on you-tube and couldn't find it. Can someone direct me to a "B-level" online link I can look at?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
DiracPool said:
ρ^2 dθ^2 + dρ^2

My question is what does the Cartesian version equal?
This is the Euclidean distance (line element) in polar coordinates.
DiracPool said:
I looked for a derivation of this formula online and on you-tube and couldn't find it.
I'll derive it for you.
Take the distance formula in 2D space in Cartesian coordinates: ##ds^2=dx^2+dy^2## (Pythagoras's theorem)
Use the coordinate conversions ##x=\rho cos \theta## and ##y=\rho sin \theta##. You can differentiate these equations to obtain ##dx= - \rho sin \theta d\theta + cos \theta d\rho## and ##dy = \rho cos \theta d\theta + sin\theta d\rho##. Just square these two and add them up to get ##ds^2 = (\rho ^2 sin^2 \theta d\theta ^2 - 2 \rho cos\theta sin \theta d\theta d\rho + cos^2 \theta d\rho^2) + (\rho ^2 cos^2 \theta d\theta ^2 +2 \rho sin\theta cos\theta d\theta d\rho + sin^2 \theta d\rho ^2) = \rho^2 d\theta^2 + d\rho^2##

(Note that deriving the line element in spherical coordinates [and other 3D coordinates] can get really messy. The polar coordinates case just happens to be really easy.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DiracPool
PWiz said:
I'll derive it for you.

Great. Thanks for that, that's exactly what I was looking for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K