Distance formula vs similar triangles

  • Thread starter Thread starter fayan77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Triangles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancy between the distance formula and the use of similar triangles to calculate distances in a geometric context. The correct distance from the origin to the intersection point of the lines is determined to be 9.6, while the participant incorrectly calculated it as 9.8 using the distance formula from the point (4,9). The actual intersection point is identified as (5.76, 7.68), which aligns with the correct application of the distance formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying coordinates and understanding the relationship between similar triangles and distance calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the distance formula in coordinate geometry
  • Knowledge of similar triangles and their properties
  • Ability to find intersection points of linear equations
  • Familiarity with basic triangle area calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the distance formula in various geometric contexts
  • Learn how to find intersection points of two lines using algebraic methods
  • Explore the properties of similar triangles and their applications in problem-solving
  • Review triangle area calculations and their relationship to side lengths and heights
USEFUL FOR

Students revisiting geometry concepts, educators teaching coordinate geometry, and anyone seeking to clarify the relationship between distance calculations and triangle properties.

fayan77
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hello, took a year off school, now shaking the rust off. so according to the book using similar triangles d=9.6 I understand how they got the answer, but i used distance formula from the point to the origin and got 9.8 I checked 9.6 and it checks out with the numbers but Idk why using the distance formula yields a different answer. am I doing something wrong?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0579.jpg
    IMG_0579.jpg
    22.5 KB · Views: 475
Physics news on Phys.org
To use the distance formula, you need the coordinates of that point. How did you find the coordinates? What were the steps that you used?
 
the book shows point A (4,9) sorry for the picture quality, my phone sucks.
 
I moved your thread to your homework section.
The picture quality is really problematic.

(4,9) are not the coordinates of any interesting point in the sketch.

9.6 is correct.
 
(4,9) is a point on that line between (0,12) and (16,0), but it is not the point of intersection {it does not satisfy the (4/3) slope from the origin}. You can find the intersection point by finding where the two lines meet.
It is not hard, just two straight lines to find the (x,y) coordinate. The actual intersection point is (5.76,7.68) which you can now use the distance formula and get the same answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
I wouldn't solve this via similar triangles, by the way. The area of a triangle can be calculated as length*height/2. You can use the vertical and horizontal sides as length and height to find the area. Then you can use the long diagonal and the unknown length (also a length/height pair) to find the unknown length.
 
yeah that is what i did i took the slope and line then derived an orthogonal line passing through origin and found the point. That point on the book is confusing tho. thanks.
 
fayan77 said:
yeah that is what i did i took the slope and line then derived an orthogonal line passing through origin and found the point.
That's not what I meant.

12=3*4 and 16=4*4, and you should recognize 3,4,5 as right triangle. Therefore, the hypothenuse has a length of 5*4=20.

The area of the triangle is 12*16/2.

If we call the unknown length h, we get 12*16/2 = 20*h/2.
The unknown length is then h=12*16/20, and that is something you can calculate easily.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
mfb said:
I wouldn't solve this via similar triangles, by the way. The area of a triangle can be calculated as length*height/2. You can use the vertical and horizontal sides as length and height to find the area. Then you can use the long diagonal and the unknown length (also a length/height pair) to find the unknown length.

Wouldn't similar triangles be the easiest possible way? Solving ##16/20 = d/12## is about as simple as it gets.

Of course, one would first need to recognize that the large triangle has hypotenuse 20, as you have indicated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
  • #10
Well, it leads to the same formula, but you have to think which side corresponds to what.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K