Distinguishable Terms in a State

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    State Terms
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,062
Reaction score
819
Let's say we have a proposition (or state, if we prefer) ##P\equiv \psi \equiv AB^\perp + e^{j \theta} A^\perp B## where, e.g., ##A^{\perp}## indicates some ket that is orthogonal to ##A##.

We also have an operator ##\hat{O}## .

Without reference to a physical context, is there a test to say whether there will be interference in the probability of observing a given eigenvalue of ##\hat{O}## as we vary the phase ##\theta## ? In other words, how would a shut-up-and-calculate robot know whether it should sum-then-square or it should square-then-sum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We need to get a projection operator ##\hat\Pi## corresponding to a given eigenvalue of ##\hat O##. Then the probability is calculated as $$ <\psi|\hat\Pi|\psi>$$ If it changes when θ changes, then we have interference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Swamp Thing