Undergrad Distribution function and random variable

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how the value of F_X(x) is derived in Table 2.1, specifically for x=1 where F_X(x)=1/2. A participant clarifies that the calculation involves counting the number of elements in the sample space, which totals four elements out of eight. This results in the probability of 4/8, simplifying to 1/2. The explanation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting distribution functions and random variables. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the foundational concepts of probability calculations in statistics.
PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
73
Hi,

I cannot figure out how they got Table 2.1. For example, how come when x=1, F_X(x)=1/2? Could you please help me with it?

prob_11.jpg

Hi-resolution copy of the image: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/2951/w9yTCQ.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You count four elements there in the table, OK ? So it is 4/8=1/2.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K