# Distribution of nucleons in the nuclei

• I
• says
No, because the size of the nucleus is not the only factor that affects how charge is distributed in a nucleus. The strong force also plays a role.f

#### says

What does this diagram tell us about the distribution of nucleons in the nuclei? - The diagram is from Krane Introductory Nuclear Physics

I know that nucleons don't congregate around a central part of a nucleus, but instead have a constant distribution throughout. i.e. The number of nucleons per unit of volume is fairly constant.

I'm not really sure why they all taper off the way they do though. Smaller mass number particles tend to taper off quicker, while larger mass number particles taper off slower. I'm not really sure why this is.

#### Attachments

• nuclear density.jpg
24.3 KB · Views: 903
I know that nucleons don't congregate around a central part of a nucleus, but instead have a constant distribution throughout. i.e. The number of nucleons per unit of volume is fairly constant
That would give horizontal lines in the diagram that drop to zero at some nucleus radius.
The densitties don't drop off sharply but taper out to zero because the nucleons are bound together by the strong force that has a very limited range (the 208Pb is the largest stable nucleus). So the nucles is a dense but but moving packing, meaning that just like with electron orbits around the nucleus, there is no sharp outer bound.

So the nucleons have a fairly constant distribution in the nucleus, but the distribution tapers off at the range of the strong force. For nuclei with larger mass number, A, this tapering off is a much longer tail?

Not much, considering the big difference in atomic number...

Nucleons have a fairly constant distribution but their charge densities drop off relatively slowly because there is no sharp outer boundary to the nucleus.

Krane says 'the distance over which the charge density drops is nearly independent of the size of the nucleus, and is usually taken to be constant.'

If the nucleus is large and there is no sharp outer boundary to it, then doesn't that mean the larger the nucleus the longer the distance over which the charge density drops?