Distribution of Weight on Two Supports

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on determining the distribution of weight on two supports when a uniform weight is placed horizontally on them. Participants explore the mechanics involved in calculating the forces exerted by each support based on their positions relative to the weight.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using the sum of moments and forces to analyze the static equilibrium of the system.
  • Others argue that the problem becomes more complex with more than two supports, requiring additional considerations such as deflection.
  • A participant describes a specific scenario with bricks to illustrate the concept of weight distribution, suggesting that moving one support affects the load each support bears.
  • Equations are presented by participants to express the relationships between the weights and distances involved, indicating how to calculate the forces on each support.
  • One participant clarifies the variables used in the equations, including the normal forces and distances from the center of gravity.
  • Another participant summarizes the weight distribution based on distances from the center of the weight, providing a formula for calculating the load on each support.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While some participants find clarity in the equations and concepts presented, there remains a lack of consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, particularly regarding the complexity introduced by different configurations of supports.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding of the concepts involved, with some needing additional explanations or resources to grasp the mechanics of torque and weight distribution.

zoobyshoe
Messages
6,514
Reaction score
1,255
An oblong weight of uniform shape and density is supported horizontally on two supports. The placement of the two supports can be shifted. What is the best way to determine what percentage of the weight is born by each support given any possible arrangement of the supports?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
sum of moments = sum of forces = 0
 
If it's a static problem. Then yes. Sum the moments about any point on the body and equate to zero. Then sum the forces in x and y directions and equate to zero. You are then left with enough equations to solve for the forces.
This assumes there are only 2 supports.
Statically indeterminant problems usually need to include some deflection to be able to solve (more than 2 supports.)
 
I have no idea what either of you are talking about.
 
FeX32 said:
I could be wrong but that seems to be about a different situation.

Here's an illustration of what I'm asking:

Say we have three bricks, A, B, and C. We stand bricks A and B upright and lay brick C on top of them such that A and B are beneath each end of C. In this position we should be able to assume that bricks A and B each bear 1/2 the weight of C.

Now if I move Brick A more toward the center of C, say 1/3 the length of C, then here I think brick A is bearing more of the weight of C than brick B is.

It seems there should be a simple formula to discover what percentage of the weight of C A is now bearing and what percentage B is bearing.
 
that is exactly what I'm talking about
 
mg -( Fna + Fnb ) = 0
mg*L2 - Fna*X1 = 0
mg*L1 - Fnb*X2 = 0

you'll know mg, L1, L2, X1 and X2
so that's three equations, and two unknowns, so you can find a solution for Fna and Fnb
 
jehan60188 said:
mg -( Fna + Fnb ) = 0
mg*L2 - Fna*X1 = 0
mg*L1 - Fnb*X2 = 0

you'll know mg, L1, L2, X1 and X2
so that's three equations, and two unknowns, so you can find a solution for Fna and Fnb

Where:

mg = mass x gravity

L = length

X = ?

Fna = Force something brick A?

Come on, guys, help me out.
 
  • #10
mg = weight of one brick
L1 = distance from axis of rotation to center of gravity of brick
L2 = distance from other axis of rotation to center of gravity of brick
X1 = distance between brick a and b
X2 = same distance
Fna = normal force exerted by brick a

if you don't understand this, you'll have to get your hands on a physics textbook, or wait for someone else to explain torque to you
 
  • #11
Suppose your brick A has a distance "a" to the left of the center of your brick C.
And suppose your brick B has a distance "b" to the right of the center of brick C.

Then the weight on A is b/(a+b) of the weight of C.
And the weight on B is a/(a+b) of the weight of C.
 
  • #12
jehan60188 said:
mg = weight of one brick
L1 = distance from axis of rotation to center of gravity of brick
L2 = distance from other axis of rotation to center of gravity of brick
X1 = distance between brick a and b
X2 = same distance
Fna = normal force exerted by brick a

if you don't understand this, you'll have to get your hands on a physics textbook, or wait for someone else to explain torque to you

No, I get this now. That was the last info I needed. Thanks for your time.
 
  • #13
I like Serena said:
Suppose your brick A has a distance "a" to the left of the center of your brick C.
And suppose your brick B has a distance "b" to the right of the center of brick C.

Then the weight on A is b/(a+b) of the weight of C.
And the weight on B is a/(a+b) of the weight of C.
THAT'S what I was looking for! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K