sid9221
- 110
- 0
Now for the proof of convergence/divergence of the geometric series we first deduce the Nth partial sum which is given by:
[tex]\frac{r(1-r^n)}{1-r}[/tex]
Now for 0<r<1 this become [tex]\frac{1}{1-r}[/tex] which clearly converges by AOL
At r>1 it's similarly obvious why it diverges.
But at r=1, I'm a bit confused. The text say's that it diverges but when I try to work it out I get:
[tex]1^n -> 1[/tex]
[tex]S_n = \frac{C*0}{1-1}[/tex]
which measn S_n = 0 which is confusing as it seems to indicate convergence ?
Am I suppose to interpret 0/0 as implying divergence ?
[tex]\frac{r(1-r^n)}{1-r}[/tex]
Now for 0<r<1 this become [tex]\frac{1}{1-r}[/tex] which clearly converges by AOL
At r>1 it's similarly obvious why it diverges.
But at r=1, I'm a bit confused. The text say's that it diverges but when I try to work it out I get:
[tex]1^n -> 1[/tex]
[tex]S_n = \frac{C*0}{1-1}[/tex]
which measn S_n = 0 which is confusing as it seems to indicate convergence ?
Am I suppose to interpret 0/0 as implying divergence ?