MHB Divergence Theorem and shape of hyperboloid

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of the divergence theorem to a hyperboloid defined by the equation x² + y² - z² = 1, with boundaries at z=0 and z=√3. The user correctly identifies the hyperboloid's shape and computes the divergence of the vector field F(x,y,z) = xi + yj + zk, yielding a volume integral of 6√3π. However, confusion arises regarding the area of the top circle at z=√3, where the user calculates the radius as 2 instead of the suggested √3. This discrepancy leads to a request for clarification on the correct radius for the top circle, as the user believes their calculations are consistent with the hyperboloid's equation. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the geometry of the hyperboloid in relation to the divergence theorem.
Mountain1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I have been doing a previous exam task involving the divergence theorem, but there is a minor detail in the answer which i can't fully understand.

I have a figur given by ${x}^{2} +{y}^{2} -{z}^{2} = 1$ , $z= 0$ and $z=\sqrt{3}$

As i have understood this is a hyperboloid going from $z=0$ to $z=\sqrt{3}$ and the radius goes from $r=1$ in the bottom circle to $r=2$ in the top circle.

I also have a vectorfield $F(x,y,z) = xi + yj + zk$

The task is then to find $\int\int F*n$ on $S$ where $S$ is the curved surface of the figur.

I then used the divergence theorem. Found $\int\int\int \operatorname{div} F dV$ to be $6\sqrt{3}\pi$ and $\int\int F dS$ of the lower to circle to be 0.

Then comes the problem. The integral of the top circle which is $\int\int z dS$ where $z=\sqrt{3}$. This means that the integral is $\sqrt{3} * \text{Area of the circle}$. Which I thought was $A= 4\pi$ with $r=2$.

The answer however suggests the radius is $\sqrt{3}$ which I find a bit hard to understand. Because when I put in $z=\sqrt{3}$ into ${x}^{2}+{y}^{2} -{z}^{2} = 1$ i get $r=2$.

Can someone please help me understand ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I get the same thing.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K