MHB Divide a big cube into 49 small cubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube
AI Thread Summary
To divide a large cube into 49 smaller cubes, first divide the large cube with a side length of 1 into 343 smaller cubes, each with a side length of 1/7. From these, 336 cubes can be combined to create 42 cubes with a side length of 2/7. This results in a total of 49 cubes, consisting of 42 larger cubes and 7 smaller ones. The discussion also references the OEIS sequence A014544 for additional insights on cube dissection. The method effectively demonstrates a systematic approach to achieving the desired division.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
Please divide a big cube into 49 small cubes
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
Please divide a big cube into 49 small cubes

[sp]You can be assumed to follow a procedure of this type. Il the side of big cube is 1, then You first divide it into 343 cubes of side $\frac{1}{7}$. Then You use 336 of them to form 42 cubes of side $\frac{2}{7}$, so that at the end 42+7=49 cubes remain...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
[sp]You can be assumed to follow a procedure of this type. Il the side of big cube is 1, then You first divide it into 343 cubes of side $\frac{1}{7}$. Then You use 336 of them to form 42 cubes of side $\frac{2}{7}$, so that at the end 42+7=49 cubes remain...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
very good ! here is my solution
if the big cake of side 6
divide the cake into three lays:
the first lay of side 2 (9 cakes)
the second lay of side 1 (36 cakes)
the third lay of side 3 (4 cakes)
9+36+4=49
 

Attachments

  • divide cake.jpg
    divide cake.jpg
    14 KB · Views: 88
Last edited:
See A014544 - OEIS for information about the number of sub-cubes into which a cube can be dissected.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top