MHB Divide a big cube into 49 small cubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube
AI Thread Summary
To divide a large cube into 49 smaller cubes, first divide the large cube with a side length of 1 into 343 smaller cubes, each with a side length of 1/7. From these, 336 cubes can be combined to create 42 cubes with a side length of 2/7. This results in a total of 49 cubes, consisting of 42 larger cubes and 7 smaller ones. The discussion also references the OEIS sequence A014544 for additional insights on cube dissection. The method effectively demonstrates a systematic approach to achieving the desired division.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
Please divide a big cube into 49 small cubes
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
Please divide a big cube into 49 small cubes

[sp]You can be assumed to follow a procedure of this type. Il the side of big cube is 1, then You first divide it into 343 cubes of side $\frac{1}{7}$. Then You use 336 of them to form 42 cubes of side $\frac{2}{7}$, so that at the end 42+7=49 cubes remain...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
[sp]You can be assumed to follow a procedure of this type. Il the side of big cube is 1, then You first divide it into 343 cubes of side $\frac{1}{7}$. Then You use 336 of them to form 42 cubes of side $\frac{2}{7}$, so that at the end 42+7=49 cubes remain...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
very good ! here is my solution
if the big cake of side 6
divide the cake into three lays:
the first lay of side 2 (9 cakes)
the second lay of side 1 (36 cakes)
the third lay of side 3 (4 cakes)
9+36+4=49
 

Attachments

  • divide cake.jpg
    divide cake.jpg
    14 KB · Views: 88
Last edited:
See A014544 - OEIS for information about the number of sub-cubes into which a cube can be dissected.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top