MHB Dividing a Quadrilateral into Equal Parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    parts
AI Thread Summary
To divide quadrilateral ABCD into two equal-area parts, point P on side AD can be used to construct a line that bisects the area. The approach involves treating the quadrilateral as a pentagon PABCD, applying a method from a related pentagon problem. By creating a triangle with apex P and base ST on edge BC, the area can be matched to that of the quadrilateral. Bisecting ST leads to point Q on BC, and drawing line PQ will effectively bisect the quadrilateral. A diagram is referenced for clarity in the construction process.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
ABCD is a quadrilateral,and point P is a point on AD ,and

between points A and D

please construct a line (passing through point P),and

divide ABCD into two parts with equal area
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: quadrilateral

Do you know how Russian revolutionaries in the beginning of the 20th century wrote letters to their comrades from tsarist prisons? They would use milk to write hidden messages between the lines. (Yes, apparently, at that time, they served milk in prisons.) When milk was dry, it was invisible, but by holding the letter over a candle, the hidden message could be revealed. I have a feeling that something is written between the lines in this problem statement as well.

Edit: Apparently, the following is incorrect. There is no reason to believe that any line through the centroid cuts a quadrilateral into two parts with equal area.

Is it not the line that passes through P and the centroid? As Wikipedia helpfully reminds, the centroid can be found by constructing the centroid of triangles into which the quadrilateral is divided by diagonals.
 
Last edited:
Re: quadrilateral

This strikes me as an extension of the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f28/change-pentagon-into-triangle-equal-area-5486/.

[sp]Regard the quadrilateral ABCD as being a pentagon PABCD, with a $180^\circ$ angle at P. Then apply the construction in comment #6 in the pentagon thread. This gives a triangle with its apex at P, whose opposite edge (ST say) contains the edge BC of the quadrilateral, and which has the same area as the quadrilateral. Now bisect ST to get a point Q on BC. The line PQ will bisect the triangle and will therefore also bisect the quadrilateral.

I would include a diagram if I had time, but I expect Albert can provide one. (Smile)[/sp]
 
Re: quadrilateral

Opalg said:
This strikes me as an extension of the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f28/change-pentagon-into-triangle-equal-area-5486/.

[sp]Regard the quadrilateral ABCD as being a pentagon PABCD, with a $180^\circ$ angle at P. Then apply the construction in comment #6 in the pentagon thread. This gives a triangle with its apex at P, whose opposite edge (ST say) contains the edge BC of the quadrilateral, and which has the same area as the quadrilateral. Now bisect ST to get a point Q on BC. The line PQ will bisect the triangle and will therefore also bisect the quadrilateral.

I would include a diagram if I had time, but I expect Albert can provide one. (Smile)[/sp]
yes the construction of the diagram is similar to the pentagon problem
now ! here is the diagram
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1002._xfImport
 

Attachments

  • Quadrilateral.jpg
    Quadrilateral.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 116
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top