MHB Dividing a Quadrilateral into Equal Parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    parts
AI Thread Summary
To divide quadrilateral ABCD into two equal-area parts, point P on side AD can be used to construct a line that bisects the area. The approach involves treating the quadrilateral as a pentagon PABCD, applying a method from a related pentagon problem. By creating a triangle with apex P and base ST on edge BC, the area can be matched to that of the quadrilateral. Bisecting ST leads to point Q on BC, and drawing line PQ will effectively bisect the quadrilateral. A diagram is referenced for clarity in the construction process.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
ABCD is a quadrilateral,and point P is a point on AD ,and

between points A and D

please construct a line (passing through point P),and

divide ABCD into two parts with equal area
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: quadrilateral

Do you know how Russian revolutionaries in the beginning of the 20th century wrote letters to their comrades from tsarist prisons? They would use milk to write hidden messages between the lines. (Yes, apparently, at that time, they served milk in prisons.) When milk was dry, it was invisible, but by holding the letter over a candle, the hidden message could be revealed. I have a feeling that something is written between the lines in this problem statement as well.

Edit: Apparently, the following is incorrect. There is no reason to believe that any line through the centroid cuts a quadrilateral into two parts with equal area.

Is it not the line that passes through P and the centroid? As Wikipedia helpfully reminds, the centroid can be found by constructing the centroid of triangles into which the quadrilateral is divided by diagonals.
 
Last edited:
Re: quadrilateral

This strikes me as an extension of the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f28/change-pentagon-into-triangle-equal-area-5486/.

[sp]Regard the quadrilateral ABCD as being a pentagon PABCD, with a $180^\circ$ angle at P. Then apply the construction in comment #6 in the pentagon thread. This gives a triangle with its apex at P, whose opposite edge (ST say) contains the edge BC of the quadrilateral, and which has the same area as the quadrilateral. Now bisect ST to get a point Q on BC. The line PQ will bisect the triangle and will therefore also bisect the quadrilateral.

I would include a diagram if I had time, but I expect Albert can provide one. (Smile)[/sp]
 
Re: quadrilateral

Opalg said:
This strikes me as an extension of the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f28/change-pentagon-into-triangle-equal-area-5486/.

[sp]Regard the quadrilateral ABCD as being a pentagon PABCD, with a $180^\circ$ angle at P. Then apply the construction in comment #6 in the pentagon thread. This gives a triangle with its apex at P, whose opposite edge (ST say) contains the edge BC of the quadrilateral, and which has the same area as the quadrilateral. Now bisect ST to get a point Q on BC. The line PQ will bisect the triangle and will therefore also bisect the quadrilateral.

I would include a diagram if I had time, but I expect Albert can provide one. (Smile)[/sp]
yes the construction of the diagram is similar to the pentagon problem
now ! here is the diagram
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1002._xfImport
 

Attachments

  • Quadrilateral.jpg
    Quadrilateral.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 118
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top