Divine Proportion - What is it & How Does it Work?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantum1332
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the "divine proportion," specifically the mathematical constant approximately equal to 1.618, often associated with aesthetics and nature. Participants explore its significance, mathematical properties, and implications in various contexts, including recursion and natural mechanisms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek clarification on how the divine proportion relates to various phenomena, questioning its universality.
  • Others argue that the divine proportion does not represent a fundamental truth, similar to other constants like π, and is simply a result of simple mathematical relationships.
  • A participant corrects an earlier claim about the value of the divine proportion, emphasizing the correct expression as \(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\).
  • There is a critique of the cultural representation of the divine proportion in popular media, specifically mentioning "The Da Vinci Code" as lacking mathematical insight.
  • Some participants propose that the divine proportion's prevalence may stem from local mechanisms in nature rather than any grand design.
  • A discussion on the simplicity of recursion arises, with differing opinions on what constitutes the simplest form of recursion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance and implications of the divine proportion, with no consensus reached on its meaning or importance in nature.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the mathematical properties and cultural representations of the divine proportion are debated, with participants expressing varying degrees of skepticism and differing interpretations of its relevance.

Quantum1332
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
So, i didn't know what this was classified as, so i settled for this genre. Can someone explain to me exactly how this works. How does everything come back to 1.618.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't, any more than "everything comes back to" 1, or 2, or 3.14! [itex]\pi[/itex] (which can be approximated by 3.14) satisfies some very basic relationships that are found (again approximately) throughout nature because they are simple. The "divine proportion", [itex]\frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2}[/itex] which is approximately 1.618, satisfies the very simple relation [itex]z=\frac{1-z}{z}[/itex] which, just because it is simple occurs throughout nature.
 
ACTUALLY, Halls, [itex]\frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2}[/itex] is less than 1, and thus only extremely approximate to 1.618..













Runs and hides within a golden rectangle..
 
Oops, writing too fast again. I meant
[tex]\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}[/tex]
which is, more accurately but still not exact, 1.6180339887498948482045868343656.
 
Quantum1332 said:
So, i didn't know what this was classified as, so i settled for this genre. Can someone explain to me exactly how this works. How does everything come back to 1.618.

If u read "the Da Vinchi Code", u'll find in it all the proportions that are related to this magic number, I read it and I was some astonished but I don't have the book now to tell u more.
But I do advise u to read it, or see the film
 
No, no, no, no.

That 'novel' is an (atrociously badly written) piece of fiction containing Dan Brown's (or it turns out his wife's) half assed research that is completely rubbish. Do not read it for the mathematical insight. Do not read it for literary merit either (it has none).
 
Is the divine proportion not so because it is the simplest from of recursion? Recursion is a very common mechanism in nature.
 
Hmm, I'd say that the recurrence relation [itex]a_{n+1}=a_{n}[/itex] is even simpler than the recurrence relation for the Fibonacci numbers.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Is the divine proportion not so[\quote]what do 'is' and 'so' mean in this context?

because it is the simplest from of recursion?

'simple' is a little subjective. see previous post by arildno.
 
  • #10
As I see it, the reason why the divine proportion occurs so often is closely related to the probable fact that most mechanisms work on a local level, and thus, any seemingly macro-scale mechanism is actually just a compound effect of local mechanisms.
That the resultant global picture should, at times, mimick the local picture isn't a too exotic possibility. But that's basically what the "divine" proportion is about.

From this perspective, it is seen that there is nothing "divine" about that proportion; rather, its prevalence indicates that there isn't any grand, intelligent design going on in nature, independent from simple, natural mechanisms.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
you can find everything related to it on :
http://www.lhup.edu/%7Edsimanek/pseudo/fibonacc.htm
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K