1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Do all calculus books contain this?

  1. Oct 5, 2013 #1
    This is from Analysis by Lieb :
    ''Things the reader is expected to know : While we more or less start from 'scratch' , we do expect the reader to know some elementary facts, all of which will have been learned in a good calculus course . These include : vector spaces , limits , lim inf, lim sup , open , closed and compact sets in ]Rn, continuity and differentiability of functions ( especially in the multivariable case ) , convergence and uniform convergence ( indeed , the notion of 'uniform ', generally ) , the definition and basic prop erties of the Riemann integral , integration by parts ( of which Gauss' s theorem is a special case ) . ''
    Is this covered in all rigourous calculus books?
    Is this book any harder than the by Carothers or Berberian?
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 6, 2013 #2

    verty

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Those are analysis topics (those that look strange). A good calculus course would focus on applications, not on things like uniform convergence.
     
  4. Oct 10, 2013 #3
    Lieb's book is a graduate-level text. The prereqs he lists sound more like what you would learn in an undergrad analysis class than the normal freshman calculus sequence, at least in the US.

    There are books with "Calculus" in their title that include analysis, notably those by Spivak, Apostol, and Courant, but they are very seldom used for a first course in calculus. They may be used for freshmen at MIT or Cal Tech, but the students in those classes typically have already had a less rigorous calculus course in high school.
     
  5. Oct 10, 2013 #4
    Yes ,those are the books I'm reading,do they contain this?
     
  6. Nov 19, 2013 #5
    Yes, reading Spivak, Apostol, or Courant should provide you with the prerequisites that Lieb discusses. On the other hand, more introductory Calculus books like Stewart, Larson, and Anton wouldn't meet those prerequisites.
     
  7. Nov 20, 2013 #6

    WannabeNewton

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Why in the world would that make it a "good" calculus course? Uniform convergence is an extremely important concept and is easy to introduce in an honors calculus class; Spivak has an entire chapter on it. Not all calculus classes are made equal, some are made for the sole purpose of doing calculus correctly from freshman year itself instead of just hand-waving things and jumping into applications (to wit not all students care about applications-some care about rigorous theory).
     
  8. Nov 20, 2013 #7

    462chevelle

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    So would you think that a school with a calculus series using only the Larson books for calculus 1,2,3 would be a little lacking in the grand scheme of things?
     
  9. Nov 20, 2013 #8
    It depends a lot on the major. For an engineering major, a book like Larson would be very suitable. A very theoretical approach is not the best idea, since engineering should focus on applications anyway. For math or physics majors however, I guess only Larson is something that is severely lacking.
     
  10. Nov 20, 2013 #9

    462chevelle

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Yea so far engineering is my intended major. I have the Larson and McKeague trig book and I have to say I prefer the Larson over the McKeague. Were using the lial book (pearson) for trig next semester though. I don't know how that will compare. I like my Lial college algebra book. How does Larson calculus compare to Stewart?
     
  11. Nov 21, 2013 #10

    verty

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I was wrong. A theory course can be good if it gives the student the ability to apply the theory rigorously. An applied course can be good if it gives the student the ability to solve problems.
     
  12. Nov 21, 2013 #11

    verty

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    This is actually a very good example of how English is a tonal language (tone carries meaning) and we don't have punctuation signs to indictate the tone. I'll use an accent sign (á, í) to indicate the tone of what I wrote, how it would have sounded if spoken:

     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Do all calculus books contain this?
  1. Calculus books (Replies: 7)

  2. Books for Calculus (Replies: 7)

Loading...