bluecap
- 395
- 13
Do animals also fall in love?
But first.. what is the difference between "in love" and "love?
But first.. what is the difference between "in love" and "love?
The discussion revolves around whether animals experience love or if such feelings are merely chemical reactions. Participants explore the differences between "in love" and "love," the emotional attachments animals may form, and the implications of attributing human-like emotions to animal behavior.
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether animals experience love as humans do. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of love in animals and the implications of chemical processes.
Some discussions highlight the limitations of defining love and emotional experiences across species, as well as the potential biases in interpreting animal behavior through a human lens.
fresh_42 said:There is no reason to assume that animal's body chemistry differs from ours. And at last, love is nothing but chemical processes.
fresh_42 said:There is no reason to assume that animal's body chemistry differs from ours. And at last, love is nothing but chemical processes.
Fervent Freyja said:Yes, some animals do seem to form emotional attachments with other animals even outside of their own species. Even as far as sexual attraction, there are many instances where male mammals have been known to be sexually aroused by female humans!
Of course it is a biomechanical process, but it is a very powerful one at that. There are many types of love, but being in love with another person is an interaction where we have perspectives of ourselves reflected back to us (or hopes that it will occur) -- a healthy narcissistic aspect is involved. Such mirrors are the most powerful way to validate our existence. Sadly, there often isn't an equal exchange or mutual feeling involved to maintain the interaction. Have you never been in love?
What type of animal?bluecap said:Do animals also fall in love?
But first.. what is the difference between "in love" and "love?
fresh_42 said:There is no reason to assume that animal's body chemistry differs from ours. And at last, love is nothing but chemical processes.
I admit I should have narrowed it down to "mammals living on the same planet" just to make it less vulnerable (but not for scientific reasons!). Mammals hormones evolved very similar for good reasons, esp. oxytocin.Kevin McHugh said:Yeah, some would think that statement debatable.
I suppose that is where the research lies - in how much is rote or roster, as opposed to information processing.newjerseyrunner said:I can name several types of animals that certainly experience the emotion of love between other members of their or other species: primates, dogs, elephants, parrots. Koko the gorilla has expressed love for multiple humans and her cats and Alex the parrots last words expressed love to his trainer. Humans aren't the only mostly monogamous species, any animal that pairs up like that would likely have a chemical process that could be described as in love.