Do anti-particles have opposite parity?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter johne1618
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parity
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 12K views
johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I understand that anti-particles have the opposite charge to particles.

Do anti-particles have the opposite parity to particles as well?

John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anti-particles have not only charge, but all their conservation numbers, among them charge and parity, opposite to their "normal" particles.
 
Actually, is that right?

I looked on hyperphysics and it said only the "internal" quantum numbers are reversed under charge conjugation not the spatial coordinates.

John
 
johne1618 said:
I looked on hyperphysics and it said only the "internal" quantum numbers are reversed under charge conjugation not the spatial coordinates.
Sure! You're right. I gave too quick answer...
Parity of compound particle (e.g. hadrons) is composed (multiplicatively) of internal parities of quarks and the parity of their relative geometry. The last do not differ from particle to anti-particle.
So both mesons and their anti-mesons have same parity ([itex]-1^{spin+1}[/itex]). Baryons, as composed of 3 quarks, have parity +1, while their counterparts have -1.
 
So both mesons and their anti-mesons have same parity (−1)spin+1
Still too quick. There are plenty of mesons that obey this rule, and plenty more that do not. The spin-parity of a meson includes contributions from both the intrinsic properties of the quarks and the orbital wavefunction as well. Take a look at a list of the charmonium and bottomonium states.
 
The parity of meson considered as q-qbar bound states is (-1)^L+1.
The spin of the meson equals L if the q-qbar are in a spin zero state, but can be different if the q-qbar are in a spin 1 state. Gauge bosons have negative intrinsic parity.
The parity of a boson antiparticle is the same as the particle.
 
So, when in texts it refers to applying charge conjuction (C) as replacing a particle with its antiparticle... this isn't strictly true? As particles whose antiparticle has opposite parity, would need you to apply CP to the particle to get the antiparticle?
 
An antimeson has the same parity as the corresponding meson.
A fermion.s only has relative parity with another fermion or its antifermion.
The relative parity of the proton and antiproton is negative.
The relative parity of the nucleon and the and the Delta is positive.
Relative parity of a nucleon and the Lambda cannot be defined because parity is not conserved in Lambda decay.