Do Antitachyons Travel Slower Than Light?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter skywolf
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between tachyons and antitachyons, specifically questioning whether antitachyons travel slower than light. Tachyons are defined as faster-than-light (FTL) particles, while antitachyons are equated to standard particles such as electrons, protons, and neutrons that travel slower than light. The conversation references Feynman's interpretation of antiparticles, suggesting that if an antiparticle travels backward in time, it behaves as a tachyon. However, the distinction between the electron and positron wave functions in quantum electrodynamics (QED) complicates this relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tachyons and their properties
  • Familiarity with quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Knowledge of particle-antiparticle relationships
  • Basic grasp of spacetime concepts and worldlines
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and implications of tachyons in theoretical physics
  • Study the role of antiparticles in quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Explore the concept of worldlines in spacetime diagrams
  • Investigate Feynman's interpretation of particles traveling backward in time
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the implications of faster-than-light particles and their antiparticles.

skywolf
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
if a tachyon travels faster than the speed of light would an antitachyon travel slower?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A tachyon defines all FTL particles, not a specific particle.

If you were to define "anti-tachyons", they would simply be our garden-variety STL electrons, protons, neutrons etc.
 
skywolf said:
if a tachyon travels faster than the speed of light would an antitachyon travel slower?

I see your point; if the antiparticle of the electron (travelling slower than light on a timelike worldline) travels "backward in time" (according to Feynmann) i.e. FTL on a spacelike worldline, then it is a tachyon and its antiparticle is the timelike electron.

People keep telling us the "backward in time" is just notational; the difference between the electron wave function and the positron wave function in QED can be expressed by putting in t -> -t. So I don't think you can push this statement to draw conclusions from it.

The positron is visibly a real particle that leaves timelike tracks in detectors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K