Do Any Bacteria or Archaea Use Metabolic Pathways Other Than Glycolysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nereid
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Bacteria and archaea exhibit metabolic pathways beyond glycolysis, with hydrotropic methanogens being a prime example. These organisms utilize carbon dioxide and hydrogen to produce methane, generating ATP without glycolysis. The discussion highlights the ongoing exploration of convergent evolution in non-glycolytic pathways, particularly within the molecular biology community, though definitive evidence remains elusive. The inquiry into alternative metabolic processes, such as photosynthesis and chemosynthesis, further underscores the complexity of microbial metabolism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrotropic methanogens and their metabolic processes
  • Familiarity with ATP generation mechanisms in microbial life
  • Knowledge of convergent evolution in evolutionary biology
  • Basic concepts of photosynthesis and chemosynthesis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the metabolic pathways of hydrotropic methanogens
  • Explore the role of ATP generation in non-glycolytic organisms
  • Investigate the evidence for convergent evolution in microbial metabolism
  • Study the mechanisms of photosynthesis and chemosynthesis in bacteria and archaea
USEFUL FOR

Microbiologists, evolutionary biologists, and researchers interested in microbial metabolism and the evolution of metabolic pathways.

Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,392
Reaction score
3
One more question about the evolution of life, but perhaps not in the Archaen or Proterozoic.

Are there any bacteria or archaea known to use metabolic pathways other than (one or more variants of) glycolysis? Which do not use any form of glycolysis? If so, details please!

I'm particularly interested in whether these cases, if there are any, evolved from a common ancestor, or whether they are examples of convergent evolution.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
methanogens

This was thought to be correct when I researched the topic several years ago --

Hydrotropic methanogens use carbon dioxide as a source of carbon; hydrogen as a source of energy. Carbon dioxide is reduced by hydrogen to produce methane. The methane is turn gives rise to a proton motive force across a membrane, which is used to generate ATP – a key source of cellular energy.

No mention of glycolysis.

You can start here:

http://jfa.bio.qmul.ac.uk/lectures/cell_biology_and_developmental_genetics/Hydrogen_hyp.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What about photosynthesis?
Or chemosythesis?
Or pentose phosphate?
 
Thanks jim macnamara and zomgwtf.

Is there any evidence of convergent evolution, of non-glycolysis pathways?
 
Nereid said:
Thanks jim macnamara and zomgwtf.

Is there any evidence of convergent evolution, of non-glycolysis pathways?

I think that is an issue that is still being explored by the molecular biology crowd. Given how often the assumption that convergent evolution must not happen is turned on its head by that field, I wouldn't be shocked if it turned out that there is such convergence. I can't find, nor have I heard of anything definitive in the field, yet, which supports or refutes the notion.
 
nismaratwork said:
I think that is an issue that is still being explored by the molecular biology crowd. Given how often the assumption that convergent evolution must not happen is turned on its head by that field, I wouldn't be shocked if it turned out that there is such convergence. I can't find, nor have I heard of anything definitive in the field, yet, which supports or refutes the notion.

I agree. I haven't gone into that much depth in gylcolosis but I'm pretty sure our understanding of the evolution of various pathways is pretty limited.

I'm not even sure this will ever be definitively answered although it's agood question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K