Do any physicists switch to cooking?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the intersection of physics and cooking, exploring whether physicists engage in cooking as a hobby or stress-relief. Participants share personal anecdotes, humor, and insights into the relationship between analytical thinking and culinary practices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with the time it takes to cook compared to eating, highlighting a perceived inefficiency.
  • Another mentions ZapperZ, a physicist who took up baking as a stress-reliever during graduate school, suggesting that some physicists do engage in cooking.
  • Several participants discuss the idea of cooking as an analytical process, with one proposing the use of precise measurements and techniques akin to scientific experimentation.
  • There is humor regarding the concept of cooking, with some joking about rituals and sacrifices, while others challenge these notions playfully.
  • Participants share links to resources like "Cooking for Engineers," indicating a blend of engineering principles with culinary practices.
  • Some participants argue that professional cooks may rely on intuition rather than precise measurements, while others counter that chefs also strive for reproducibility in their dishes.
  • Discussions include the variability in home cooking and the importance of precision in baking, with anecdotes about personal cooking experiences and adjustments made to recipes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the relationship between cooking and scientific principles. While some find value in precise measurements, others emphasize the creative and variable nature of cooking. The discussion remains unresolved on whether cooking should be approached with the same rigor as scientific experimentation.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific cooking techniques and personal experiences, but there is no consensus on the best approach to cooking or the role of physicists in culinary practices.

  • #31
http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/recipes/recipe/0,,FOOD_9936_6536,00.html

I'm hecka going to make that today. If i do a good job, maybe ill make liek 40 for christmas when the family comes over. But I don't know how long to cook the meat :P or what half the damn words are!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Moonbear said:
Uh oh...I guess they forgot their calculator.:smile:

Pengwuino said:
typical engineers :rolleyes:

Calculators? Engineers don't need no stinking calculators. Just set g=10 m/s^2 and \pi=3.
 
  • #33
Pengwuino said:
http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/recipes/recipe/0,,FOOD_9936_6536,00.html
I'm hecka going to make that today. If i do a good job, maybe ill make liek 40 for christmas when the family comes over. But I don't know how long to cook the meat :P or what half the damn words are!

You really can't go wrong with a recipe that calls for 1/4 cup of bacon drippings.:-p :!) :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
DocToxyn said:
You really can't go wrong with a recipe that calls for 1/4 cup of bacon drippings.:-p :!) :biggrin:
:smile: Sounds yummy, but you better make it after you have a big brunch for all the relatives. I don't know how else one manages to have 1/4 cup of bacon drippings for such a recipe unless you eat BLTs for a week. Sounds pretty tasty though.
 
  • #35
Tom Mattson said:
Calculators? Engineers don't need no stinking calculators. Just set g=10 m/s^2 and \pi=3.

And they wonder why I say I am amazed that cars actually run now-a-days :rolleyes:
 
  • #36
Pengwuino said:
And they wonder why I say I am amazed that cars actually run now-a-days :rolleyes:

Better that than having physicists design them.

"Assume the horse is a sphere..."
 
  • #37
rachmaninoff said:
"Assume the horse is a sphere..."

:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
  • #38
You know, I wanted to try to cook, but I couldn't figure out what those archaic measures meant. Volume measures like 'cup' and 'spoon'. How much does that translate to in SI units anyway?

(I usually go for shoarma)
 
  • #39
Galileo said:
You know, I wanted to try to cook, but I couldn't figure out what those archaic measures meant. Volume measures like 'cup' and 'spoon'. How much does that translate to in SI units anyway?
(I usually go for shoarma)
You've got a scale on your kitchen counter accurate enought to measure 1,5 grams of salt? The teaspoon method is brilliant :smile:
 
  • #40
Tom Mattson said:
Calculators? Engineers don't need no stinking calculators. Just set g=10 m/s^2 and \pi=3.
You got that right!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
13K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
50K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K