Do black holes determine time's arrow?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shlosmem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between black holes and the concept of time's arrow, exploring theoretical implications of black holes and white holes within the framework of general relativity. Participants examine the nature of these entities, their formation, and their roles in the context of thermodynamics and spacetime geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether black holes determine time's arrow, particularly in relation to the concept of white holes and time-reversed scenarios.
  • One viewpoint suggests that the maximally extended Schwarzschild black hole includes both black and white holes, with time reversal transforming one into the other.
  • Another participant challenges the physical plausibility of white holes, arguing that under time reversal, a collapsing mass should still conform to gravitational rules, questioning the nature of white holes.
  • There is a discussion about singularities, with some participants suggesting that black hole singularities are not points but moments in time, complicating the understanding of mass and gravity in these contexts.
  • Some argue that the existence of white holes as initial conditions is problematic, as they cannot be formed from existing particles and their evolution would violate the second law of thermodynamics.
  • Others propose that black holes evaporate through Hawking radiation, suggesting a time-reversed scenario could yield a black hole from Hawking radiation.
  • Participants express differing views on whether black holes set the arrow of time, with some asserting that thermodynamics is the underlying factor rather than the nature of black or white holes.
  • There is a contention regarding the internal states of black and white holes, with some participants asserting that they are not identical and that their differences are rooted in their roles within spacetime.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether black holes determine time's arrow. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the nature and implications of black holes and white holes, as well as their relationship to thermodynamics and spacetime.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight limitations in understanding the physical implications of white holes, suggesting they may be mathematical solutions rather than representations of actual phenomena in the universe. The complexity of the Schwarzschild solution and its implications for spacetime evolution are noted as requiring further exploration.

  • #121
PeterDonis said:
Note that the only possible meaning for "eternal black hole" here is actually the maximally extended Kruskal-Szekeres geometry; no other "black hole" is eternal. And, as I noted in post #118 just now, in that geometry, there are two "hole" regions, not one: there is a black hole region and a white hole region, and they are not the same. So while it is possible to have a fully time symmetric trajectory for a free-falling particle in this geometry, any such trajectory will start on the white hole singularity, emerge from the white hole horizon, rise to some maximum altitude in the exterior region, fall back inside the black hole horizon, and end on the black hole singularity. It will not fall back into the same region of spacetime from which it emerged.
Well, it’s always impossible to fall back to the same region of spacetime that you came from. Time will be different if nothing else.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
PeterDonis said:
This is impossible inside an actual black hole.
If we take the Schwarzschild geometry as the background geometry, and consider test particles moving in that background, then there are solutions of the equations of motion where the particle is “falling” as a function of proper time and solutions where the particle is “rising” as a function of proper time. In the region with r less than the Schwarzschild radius, the sign of dr/ds can never change.
 
  • #123
stevendaryl said:
If we take the Schwarzschild geometry as the background geometry, and consider test particles moving in that background, then there are solutions of the equations of motion where the particle is “falling” as a function of proper time and solutions where the particle is “rising” as a function of proper time.
Yes. The former solutions are inside the black hole region, and the latter solutions are inside the white hole region.

stevendaryl said:
In the region with r less than the Schwarzschild radius, the sign of dr/ds can never change.
That's correct, but there are two such regions, one for each possible sign of dr/ds.
 
  • #124
stevendaryl said:
it’s always impossible to fall back to the same region of spacetime that you came from.
By "region of spacetime" I meant one of the four regions in the maximally extended Schwarzschild geometry: the "right" exterior, the black hole, the "left" exterior, and the white hole.
 
  • #125
PeterDonis said:
The former solutions are inside the black hole region, and the latter solutions are inside the white hole region.
And in the region outside the horizons. Both types of solutions exist there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K