Do electrons accelerate when transitioning from one energy state to another?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Electrons do not accelerate in the classical sense when transitioning between energy states in an atom; rather, they exist in a probabilistic framework defined by quantum mechanics. The concept of position, speed, or acceleration is not applicable to bound electrons as described by quantum physics. Instead, their behavior is represented by a wave function, which provides probabilities for their locations rather than definitive paths. The discussion emphasizes that interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as Bohmian mechanics, may suggest different views on electron motion, but standard quantum mechanics does not support the notion of definite trajectories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions and probability distributions.
  • Familiarity with Schrödinger's equation and its implications for particle behavior.
  • Knowledge of the differences between classical and quantum descriptions of particles.
  • Awareness of interpretations of quantum mechanics, including Bohmian mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Schrödinger equation on electron behavior in atoms.
  • Explore the differences between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics in particle motion.
  • Investigate various interpretations of quantum mechanics, focusing on Bohmian mechanics.
  • Examine experimental evidence related to electron transitions and energy states in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the fundamental behavior of electrons and their interactions in atomic systems.

  • #31
PeroK said:
If you take an electron in the ground state of the Hydrogen atom and measure its total angular momentum you get 0 with 100% probability.

The expected value of its kinetic energy is, however, non zero.

What sort of orbit is that, you might ask? Well, it's a quantum mechanical "orbit", which cannot be reasonably explained in classical terms. In particular, in this system it makes little sense to think of the electron "moving" at all.
Some things don't seem to make sense in quantum mechanics. I am sure you ll tell me that they don't make "classical" sense but they make "quantum mechanical" sense. Seems to me one has to redefine fundamental concepts such as the concept of movement in order for QM to make sense.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: Dadface and weirdoguy
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Delta2 said:
Seems to me one has to redefine fundamental concepts such as the concept of movement in order for QM to make sense.

And if you can point to something in the math that you think deserves to be called "movement" and give a good argument, you might get such a redefinition accepted. But you're not going to do it by just saying "seems to me".
 
  • #33
PeterDonis said:
And if you can point to something in the math that you think deserves to be called "movement" and give a good argument, you might get such a redefinition accepted. But you're not going to do it by just saying "seems to me".
No there isn't anything in the math about movement, but somethings just don't make sense. Like we talk about position and momentum in HUP, but a particle doesn't have definite position and velocity and it is like we are forbidden to talk about its "movement". How does this makes sense to you I don't know but it doesn't seem to make sense to me. Maybe you understand it as the particle being simultaneously in many places with a different probability in each place. But this understanding certainly doesn't make classical sense, might make quantum mechanical sense though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dadface
  • #34
Delta2 said:
we talk about position and momentum in HUP

That's one pair of non-commuting observables to which the HUP applies, but it's by no means the only such pair.

Delta2 said:
this understanding certainly doesn't make classical sense

You're right, it doesn't. Welcome to quantum mechanics, where the first lesson is: the world is not classical. Classical physics is an approximation that works well in some domains, but that's all it is. You should not expect everything to make sense in classical terms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #35
The OP appears to be gone and the thread topic has been thoroughly covered. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K