High School Do electrons accelerate when transitioning from one energy state to another?

Click For Summary
Electrons do not have a definite position, velocity, or trajectory in quantum mechanics, making traditional concepts of motion and acceleration less applicable. When electrons transition between energy states, it does not imply physical movement in the classical sense; rather, it reflects a change in energy levels. The wave function describes the probability of an electron's location, but does not provide a definitive path or position. Different interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as Bohmian mechanics, suggest that particles can have motion, but these interpretations are not universally accepted. Overall, quantum mechanics emphasizes probabilistic behavior rather than classical motion for electrons.
  • #31
PeroK said:
If you take an electron in the ground state of the Hydrogen atom and measure its total angular momentum you get 0 with 100% probability.

The expected value of its kinetic energy is, however, non zero.

What sort of orbit is that, you might ask? Well, it's a quantum mechanical "orbit", which cannot be reasonably explained in classical terms. In particular, in this system it makes little sense to think of the electron "moving" at all.
Some things don't seem to make sense in quantum mechanics. I am sure you ll tell me that they don't make "classical" sense but they make "quantum mechanical" sense. Seems to me one has to redefine fundamental concepts such as the concept of movement in order for QM to make sense.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes Dadface and weirdoguy
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Delta2 said:
Seems to me one has to redefine fundamental concepts such as the concept of movement in order for QM to make sense.

And if you can point to something in the math that you think deserves to be called "movement" and give a good argument, you might get such a redefinition accepted. But you're not going to do it by just saying "seems to me".
 
  • #33
PeterDonis said:
And if you can point to something in the math that you think deserves to be called "movement" and give a good argument, you might get such a redefinition accepted. But you're not going to do it by just saying "seems to me".
No there isn't anything in the math about movement, but somethings just don't make sense. Like we talk about position and momentum in HUP, but a particle doesn't have definite position and velocity and it is like we are forbidden to talk about its "movement". How does this makes sense to you I don't know but it doesn't seem to make sense to me. Maybe you understand it as the particle being simultaneously in many places with a different probability in each place. But this understanding certainly doesn't make classical sense, might make quantum mechanical sense though.
 
  • Like
Likes Dadface
  • #34
Delta2 said:
we talk about position and momentum in HUP

That's one pair of non-commuting observables to which the HUP applies, but it's by no means the only such pair.

Delta2 said:
this understanding certainly doesn't make classical sense

You're right, it doesn't. Welcome to quantum mechanics, where the first lesson is: the world is not classical. Classical physics is an approximation that works well in some domains, but that's all it is. You should not expect everything to make sense in classical terms.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #35
The OP appears to be gone and the thread topic has been thoroughly covered. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K