Do gamma and X-ray wavelength photons also exist as collapse able wave fx's?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of photons, particularly gamma and X-ray photons, and whether they can be considered as collapseable wave functions. The inquiry is specifically related to the decay of Tc^99m and the implications of photon behavior across different wavelengths, including gamma, X-ray, and radio frequencies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether different wavelength energies, such as gamma and X-ray photons, are fundamentally the same and if they represent the collapse of an expanding wave function.
  • Another participant suggests that while light, X-rays, and gamma radiation are similar, they do not possess a "wavefunction" in the conventional sense due to the ability to create and destroy photons easily, indicating a need to consider photons as quanta of the electromagnetic field.
  • A third participant clarifies that photons are not destroyed when light is turned off; rather, they continue to travel until they interact with something.
  • A later reply acknowledges the previous point about the lack of conserved probability density for individual photons as helpful.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of photons and their wave functions, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a consensus on the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the nature of photons and their behavior, particularly regarding wave functions and probability densities, which remain unresolved.

xander77
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This question has gone unanswered by our friends in nuclear/atomic threads.

My question relates to a solitary Tc^99m decay in particular, and to gamma rays in general. If light is a collapse able wave function, are different wavelength energies the same, ie gamma, x, radio, etc.

My suspicion is yes. Does this mean that a gamma photon detected from a far away galaxy is in fact the collapse of an ever expanding wave function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light is essentially the same thing as x-ray or gamma radiation at a lower energy, yes. But I don't think it has a "wavefunction" in any ordinary sense. The reason for this is that you can create and destroy billions of photons as easily as switching on and off a light bulb, so there's no conserved probability density for any individual photon. Instead, you have to think about a photon as the quantum of the electromagnetic field.
 
Photons are not destroyed by turning off a light, they are just no longer created. The emitted photons travel onward until acting upon something, no?
 
>there's no conserved probability density for any individual photon.

This is helpful, thank you

>Instead, you have to think about a photon as the quantum of the electromagnetic field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K