Do Mars' Lagrange Points Exist Near Phobos and Deimos?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Mars has Lagrange Points L1 and L2, located approximately 1 million kilometers from the planet, but these points are long-term unstable, making it unlikely for any natural objects to exist there. Instead, they can be utilized for artificial satellites or space stations, which would require periodic thrust for station-keeping. Additionally, Mars' trailing L5 Trojan Point is occupied by the asteroid 'Eureka', located between 1.3 - 1.8 AU from Mars. The discussion highlights the distinction between Sun-Mars Lagrange points and those associated with Mars' moons, Phobos and Deimos, which are deemed unstable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange Points in celestial mechanics
  • Knowledge of orbital dynamics and stability
  • Familiarity with Mars' moons, Phobos and Deimos
  • Basic principles of satellite station-keeping
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the dynamics of Lagrange Points and their stability
  • Explore the concept of Trojan asteroids and their significance
  • Learn about artificial satellite station-keeping techniques
  • Investigate the orbital characteristics of Mars' moons, Phobos and Deimos
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, science fiction writers, and space mission planners interested in the dynamics of Mars and its gravitational interactions with its moons and the Sun.

Dr Wu
Messages
183
Reaction score
42
I'm trying to find out if Mars has any Lagrange Points - L1 and L2 specifically. A lengthy trawl through Google's webpages suggest that they may exist, although if so they would be extremely close to Mars, being gravitationally bound by Phobos and Deimos. Is this true?

PS. Should Mars indeed have L1 & L2 at greater distances than suggested above, what sort of distances might these be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I forgot to mention that the above query is tied up with my writing - hence it being placed in Physics Forums' SF category.
 
Do you mean Sun-Mars Lagrange points, or Mars and its satellites?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr Wu
Both L1 and L2 do exist, but they are not stable ie the probability of anything there is close to zero. Certainly nothing large enough to observe, perhaps some small debris. L4 and L5 probably have something as Mars is fairly close to the asteroid belt and has probably picked up some smaller asteroids that tag along at those two points. Jupiter certainly has them, and any moons, asteroids, or rocks at the L4 or L5 locations are called Trojan satellites.
.
Bandersnatch's question is valid, but the points "Mars and its satellites" he is referring to are definitely unstable and nothing (of any size) would be there. Actually the one of the two moons is already inside the Roche limit and if the moon was any larger, it would be torn apart.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr Wu
Re. Bandersnatch: Yes, I did mean the Sun-Mars Lagrange points, not those of Mars' two satellites. I should have made this distinction clearer.

Re. CalcNerd: Hmm, I was planning to (fictitiously) locate an orbiting space station at the Sun-Mars L2 Point, but only if the distance was sufficiently great enough - i.e. something approaching Earth's L2 Point. I hadn't considered instability issues until now. On reflection, I'm more than happy to relocate to Mars' trailing L5 Trojan Point, which I understand is occupied by the asteroid 'Eureka'. I say 'relocate' because I had considered this option once before, but backed off after failing to ascertain both L4 and L5's distances from Mars. The Wikipedia article on Eureka, however, has resolved this issue by citing a distance that varies between 1.3 - 1.8 AU, both of which lie well within the 'comfort zone' as far as they apply to my present (literary) needs.

Many thanks for jolting me in the right direction :)
 
The Sun-Mars L1 and L2 are located approx. 1 million kilometers from Mars. They are, as was said, long-term unstable, so you won't find any natural object orbiting there. But you can still put a satellite or a space station around one (likely on a Lissajous orbit), and keep it there artificially with periodic application of thrust.
I don't know how much delta-v is needed, how often, to keep stuff there, but it'll certainly be a bigger problem for larger masses. Depending on hardness of your s-f you could just entirely handwave it, or mention some unspecified on-board ion (or whatever) thrusters that are used for station keeping.
 
Personally speaking, I'm reluctant to handwave anything at all if I can possibly help it. Still, there's a limit to what might be described as hard-nosed SF and there's been several occasions in the past when I've had to hold my nose and engage in a spot of handwaving - if only to keep things moving. Certainly, the periodic attitude thrusts by a slowly revolving space station would be a convincing enough solution. I gather the ISS has to do this from time to time in order to maintain its orbital path round the Earth, likewise the HST. Well, if it works in reality, why not in fiction?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K