Do moon phases affect weighing precision on the microgram range?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential effects of lunar phases on the precision of weighing a sample in a controlled environment. Participants explore various factors that could contribute to weight variations observed during the weighing process, particularly in the context of temperature fluctuations and environmental influences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports a weight loss of approximately 0.015 g after reaching a set temperature of 50°C, suggesting a possible connection to air density changes and the lunar cycle.
  • Another participant calculates tidal accelerations and argues that the weight change observed is not attributable to the Moon, as the forces involved are too small.
  • Convection currents caused by the sample's temperature are proposed as a potential source of error, with a suggestion to monitor a reference weight over a 24-hour period to observe tidal effects.
  • Some participants emphasize that the lunar phase itself may not influence the weight, but rather the tidal range during new or full moons could have an effect.
  • Static charge is mentioned as a possible contributor to the observed weight changes, with a recommendation to use an ionizer to mitigate this variable.
  • Several experimental suggestions are made, including checking for instrumentation drift, testing with different materials, and observing the sample's behavior at varying temperatures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the influence of the lunar cycle on weight measurements, with some dismissing it as negligible while others consider it a potential factor. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing hypotheses presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to account for various environmental and instrumental factors that could affect measurements, including static charge, convection currents, and potential chemical reactions, indicating that assumptions about measurement accuracy may need to be reevaluated.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those involved in precision weighing, experimental physics, or anyone exploring the effects of environmental factors on measurement accuracy.

lionpauu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Do Moon phases affect weighing precision on the microgram range, over several hours days at elevated temperatures?
Hi,

I'm looking to improve the precision of a system over a several hour cycle of operation of +50°C operation.
The mass is ~11g and is suspended below the balance via a factory provided point. The "sample" is enclosed within a large borosilicate flask 150mm dia x 450 mm height that is trace heated the floor is also heated and all report a 0.1°C deviation from the setpoint of 50°C. The sample itself is monitored via a non-contact IR sensor and reports a 0.1g °C max variation.

So the problem is that the sample will apparently lose up to ~0.015 g after achieving the temperature set point, and this drift will continue for several hours. I have reduced this rate by better sealing the falsk to air ingress and also I think some of the system was accumulating a static charge.

So my question is has anyone an explication of why the loss and recovery inverse to temperature, the loss in air density should increase the apparent wt, could the lunar cycle be having an impact? My balance can resolve 0.0001g and I am logging the data remotely.

There is more on my problem on twitter...

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tidal accelerations are of the order of ## \frac{m_M GR_{E}}{d^3} = 5\cdot10^{-7} \frac{m}{s^2}##, for an 11 gram object that's ~5 nanonewton or the weight of ~0.5 microgram. Whatever you see, it's not coming from the Moon.

A static charge could produce a force like that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davyzhu and lionpauu
Welcome to PF.

Convection currents, driven by the temperature of the sample, could cause problems by dragging the sample upwards.

If you think the effect is tidal, then set up a reference weight and record the reading over the next 24 hours. Does the data show two cycles of tide per day ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and lionpauu
Even if it's coming from the moon, it's not coming from the phase of the moon, which is a statement about from which direction the moon is lit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and lionpauu
Vanadium 50 said:
Even if it's coming from the moon, it's not coming from the phase of the moon, which is a statement about from which direction the moon is lit.
True, but the tidal range is significantly greater during the new or full moon. Then the Sun, Earth and Moon lie on a straight line.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and lionpauu
mfb said:
A static charge could produce a force like that.
Should be easy enough to set up an ionizer to eliminate that variable. Probably the quickest way.
 
Some thoughts:
Does your instrumentation drift? Check for zero shift with zero weight, both with and without heat.
Is there a chemical reaction that releases a small amount of material as a gas? Repeat test with a metal sample.
Is something evaporating? Ditto.
Is the effect temperature dependent? Check by testing at, for example, 30 and 40 deg C.
Are convective air currents pulling the warm object up?
What happens if you hold at 50 deg C for several hours, then shut the heater off while continuing logging until it cools to room temperature?
What happens if you hold at temperature for 24 (or more) hours?

You cannot assume that instrumentation is measuring what you think it is measuring. You need to check everything before running an actual test. I used to call it "testing the test".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb, Bystander and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K