Do nonlocal deterministic QM theories violate the speed of light?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of nonlocal deterministic quantum mechanics (QM) theories regarding the speed of light. Participants argue that entangled electrons, when measured, exhibit opposite spins without any influence from one another, thus not violating the principles of relativity. The consensus is that the phenomenon of entanglement does not allow for faster-than-light communication or influence, affirming that no violation occurs. This conclusion reinforces the understanding of quantum entanglement and its alignment with established physical laws.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically entanglement.
  • Familiarity with the concept of nonlocality in physics.
  • Knowledge of the implications of the speed of light as a cosmic speed limit.
  • Basic grasp of measurement theory in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum entanglement on communication technologies.
  • Study the principles of nonlocality in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the relationship between quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity.
  • Investigate deterministic interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as pilot-wave theory.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of quantum theory and its implications for the speed of light and nonlocality.

SeventhSigma
Messages
256
Reaction score
0
See topic
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nonlocality has never seemed non-local to me. Two electrons are in the same state except with opposite spin and when separating and taking a subsequent measurement you find that if one is spin up the other is spin down. How is that a surprise? It is not as if you can change the spin of an electron and cause the entangled electron to change it's spin, so there is no violation.
 
Yes. (This is the answer to the question posed in the title of this thread.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K