Do Refrigerants have more heat capacity than water?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that refrigerants, specifically Chlorodifluoromethane (R22), have a higher effective heat capacity compared to water when considering their ability to transport heat. The latent heat of vaporization for R22 is 233 kJ/kg, which, when compared to the specific heat capacity of water (Cp_H2O), demonstrates that refrigerants require lower mass flow rates to achieve the same heating or cooling effect. The temperature range for refrigerants is broader than that of water, allowing for more efficient heat transfer in HVAC applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of latent heat of vaporization and specific heat capacity
  • Familiarity with refrigerant properties and applications
  • Knowledge of HVAC systems and heat transfer principles
  • Basic thermodynamics concepts related to temperature ranges
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific heat capacity of various refrigerants compared to water
  • Learn about the thermodynamic properties of Chlorodifluoromethane (R22)
  • Investigate the impact of temperature ranges on heat transfer efficiency in HVAC systems
  • Explore the concept of usable heat capacity in refrigerant applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, HVAC professionals, and students in thermodynamics who are interested in optimizing heating and cooling systems using refrigerants.

rollingstein
Messages
644
Reaction score
16
I was reading this report prepared by PNNL which says (page 16):

"Using refrigerant to deliver heating and cooling requires less energy because of the larger heat capacity of the refrigerant relative to air and even water. Less mass flow is needed to deliver the same amount of heating or cooling."

http://www.gsa.gov/portal/mediaId/169771/fileName/GPG_VRF_Report_-_FINAL_DRAFT_4-16-13

Is this really true? I see for Chlorodifluoromethane (R22) a latent heat of vaporization of 233 kJ/kg.

How is that more heat capacity than water?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Latent heat of vaporization is not the same as heat capacity.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Latent heat of vaporization is not the same as heat capacity.

What is the usable heat capacity of R22 in a typical refrigerant application? I assumed that was the latent heat.
 
Is "useable heat capacity" a term of the art somewhere? Please provide a reference.
Check your assumptions against what the author is talking about - i.e. ability to transport heat compared with air and water.
Remember to compare like with like - what is the latent heat of vaporization for air? Does it make more sense, in that case, to compare the specific heat capacity (at constant pressure say)?
 
Something important that you forget is the temperature range you can use when transporting heat from the room unit, which will be at room temperature and the chiller on the roof where the temperature must be above freezing if you use water. The temperature range will be less than 20 degrees K if you use water. Other refrigerants can have a much larger temperature range that can include the boiling point, so you have to include the heat of vaporization as well.
 
willem2 said:
Something important that you forget is the temperature range you can use when transporting heat from the room unit, which will be at room temperature and the chiller on the roof where the temperature must be above freezing if you use water. The temperature range will be less than 20 degrees K if you use water. Other refrigerants can have a much larger temperature range that can include the boiling point, so you have to include the heat of vaporization as well.

Understood, thanks!

So essentially we are comparing H_vap_R22 versus Cp_H2O * delta_T_H2O

With a delta_T_H2O of 20 C the refrigerent gives a higher heat capacity i.e. lower mass flows.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K