Do torque values equal compression

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chubby Hubby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compression Torque
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between torque values and compressive force when using a vise to apply force to a stack of parts. Participants explore various methods for achieving a specific compressive force, including the use of torque wrenches, hydraulic presses, and alternative approaches such as compression springs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether 100 ft/lbs of torque will equal 100 lbs of compressive force, suggesting that this may not be the case with conventional vises.
  • Another participant provides a formula relating torque input to axial force, indicating that a torque of 100 ft-lbs would generate significantly more axial force than 100 lbs, depending on screw pitch and friction factors.
  • Some participants advocate for using a hydraulic press for more reliable results, while others note budget constraints and the existing equipment available.
  • There are suggestions to use a load cell to measure compression directly, which could provide more accurate readings than relying on torque measurements.
  • One participant proposes stacking parts and applying physical weights as an alternative method for achieving the desired compressive force.
  • A suggestion is made to use a compression spring in the vise to achieve a known compression distance, allowing for the calculation of the required force based on the spring's rate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of using torque to achieve compressive force, with some arguing against it and others suggesting alternative methods. There is no consensus on the best approach, and multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that factors such as screw pitch, friction, and environmental conditions can affect the relationship between torque and axial force. The discussion also highlights practical limitations related to equipment availability and safety considerations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals involved in mechanical engineering, materials testing, or anyone interested in the practical applications of torque and compressive force in assembly processes.

Chubby Hubby
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Greetings All,
We have a stack of parts which needs to have the height measured with 100 lbs of force applied. The plan is to put the stack in a vise and, using a torque wrench, tighten to handle to 100 ft/lbs. This doesn't seem right to me. Will 100 ft/lbs of torque equal 100 lbs of compressive force on the part between the vise jaws?
Many TIA, CH
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would lean towards using a Hydraulic Press (is; bench mounted bearing press)
Your torque wrench only provides and accurate measurements at the centre of its pivot point!
As note fastener torque specifics can vary depending on environmental factors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chubby Hubby
Chubby Hubby said:
Will 100 ft/lbs of torque equal 100 lbs of compressive force on the part between the vise jaws?

No - not with vice of any conventional construction .

There is a relationship between torque input and axial force generated though :

Axial force = 0.6 * input torque * 2 * Pi / screw pitch .

The 0.6 is a factor which allows for friction in the screw thread . 0.6 is best guess for a usually crude vice screw and nut .

So if screw pitch = 0.2 inches and input torque = 100 lbs-ft then :

Axial force = 0.6 * 100 * 2 * 3.142 * / 0.2 = 1885 lbs .

To get your 100 lbs axial force the input torque needed would need to be reduced to about 5.5 lbs-ft .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule, Chubby Hubby and Mech_Engineer
VTSC87 is right about the hydraulic press though - it will give more certain results and an easier way of working .
 
In addition if you are to use a press please use all the appropriate PPE a misaligned object in a hydraulic press can quickly becoming a projectile!
Safety first!
 
VTSC87 said:
I would lean towards using a Hydraulic Press (is; bench mounted bearing press)
Your torque wrench only provides and accurate measurements at the centre of its pivot point!
As note fastener torque specifics can vary depending on environmental factors.
Thanks for the input, but due to the budget for this, and the fact that we already have a milling vise, hydraulic isn't an option.
 
Nidum said:
No - not with vice of any conventional construction .

There is a relationship between torque input and axial force generated though :

Axial force = 0.6 * input torque * 2 * Pi / screw pitch .

The 0.6 is a factor which allows for friction in the screw thread . 0.6 is best guess for a usually crude vice screw and nut .

So if screw pitch = 0.2 inches and input torque = 100 lbs-ft then :

Axial force = 0.6 * 100 * 2 * 3.142 * / 0.2 = 1885 lbs .

To get your 100 lbs axial force the input torque needed would need to be reduced to about 5.5 lbs-ft .
Thanks for the data. I'm thinking about putting a load cell in between the vise jaw and test part so we have a definitive compression reading.
 
Chubby Hubby said:
I'm thinking about putting a load cell in between the vise jaw and test part so we have a definitive compression reading.

Definitely a good thing to do - eliminates uncertainty about exact values of input torque and of effect of friction .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chubby Hubby
Hydraulic press pressure will work, but the pressure will not be 1:1 unless the area on the piston is equal to the area over which you are applying the compression.

The hydraulics I work with generally run (up to) 200 Bar or ~3,000 psi. Applying 100 lbs could well be right at the bottom of the control range - unless you have a very small press.

I would make a jig to stack the parts vertical and apply physical weights. Or Google a "compression test machine".
http://devotrans.com/hand-operated-tensile-or-compression-test-machine-dvt-mc.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chubby Hubby
  • #10
Bandit127 said:
Hydraulic press pressure will work, but the pressure will not be 1:1 unless the area on the piston is equal to the area over which you are applying the compression.

The hydraulics I work with generally run (up to) 200 Bar or ~3,000 psi. Applying 100 lbs could well be right at the bottom of the control range - unless you have a very small press.

I would make a jig to stack the parts vertical and apply physical weights. Or Google a "compression test machine".
http://devotrans.com/hand-operated-tensile-or-compression-test-machine-dvt-mc.html
Thanks, but due to the budget and harsh environment (next to a punch press), we need something fairly stout and rugged, hence the milling vise.
 
  • #11
Could you just stack them up on a bench and put a hundred pound weight on top?
 
  • #12
Jobrag said:
Could you just stack them up on a bench and put a hundred pound weight on top?
Since the diameter of the part is rather small, it would be difficult to balance 100 lbs on top of it & still get an indicator in there somewhere to measure the height.
 
  • #13
What about using a compression spring in the vise and compress to a known compression distance? It's easy enough to measure compression using a caliper, and so using the spring's spring rate you can determine how much it needs to compress to achieve 100 lbf.

Take for example this spring: http://www.centuryspring.com/compression-spring-11864.html

upload_2016-7-5_12-54-48.png


The above example has a 2.25" free length and 299 lbf/in spring rate. So to achieve 100 lbf, compress it by 0.334" (in series with your part) and voila, 100 lbf compression load.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chubby Hubby and billy_joule

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
14K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K