I Do valence electrons determine electrical conductivity?

AI Thread Summary
Valence electrons play a significant role in determining electrical conductivity, with a common belief that fewer valence electrons lead to higher conductivity due to lower ionization energy. Metals with one valence electron, like silver and copper, are often the best conductors, as they can easily lose their electrons. However, the crystal structure also influences conductivity; for example, aluminium, with three valence electrons and an FCC structure, outperforms beryllium, which has two valence electrons and an HCP structure. The relationship between valence electrons and conductivity is complex and involves multiple factors, including crystal arrangement. Understanding this interplay is essential for clarifying how valence electrons affect electrical conductivity.
milkism
Messages
118
Reaction score
15
TL;DR Summary
Does lower valence electrons lead to higher electrical conductivity?
I have trouble researching whether valence-electrons take part in electrical conductivity. Some sources say that a lower amount of valence electrons lead to an higher electrical conductivity, whilst others say the opposite. And each have their different reasons, for example, lower valence electrons lead to higher electrical conductivity, because less energy is needed to move the valence electrons.

I personally think in generally how less the amount of valence electrons how greater the electrical conductivity, because the best conductors have 1 valence electron. Because it has smaller ionisation energy, which gives up electrons easier. But it's a combination of different factors like the crystal structures, with FCC structures being better in electrical conductivity.
Beryllium has two valence electrons, but it's not a better conductor than aluminium, which has three, because the crystal structure of beryllium is HCP, where aluminium's FCC. So the combination of valence-electrons and crystal structure makes aluminium a better conductor.

I would like to know if there's actually a relation between valence-electrons and electrical conductivity, and what the correct relation is.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
milkism said:
TL;DR Summary: Does lower valence electrons lead to higher electrical conductivity?

I have trouble researching whether valence-electrons take part in electrical conductivity. Some sources say that a lower amount of valence electrons lead to an higher electrical conductivity, whilst others say the opposite. And each have their different reasons, for example, lower valence electrons lead to higher electrical conductivity, because less energy is needed to move the valence electrons.

I personally think in generally how less the amount of valence electrons how greater the electrical conductivity, because the best conductors have 1 valence electron. Because it has smaller ionisation energy, which gives up electrons easier. But it's a combination of different factors like the crystal structures, with FCC structures being better in electrical conductivity.
Beryllium has two valence electrons, but it's not a better conductor than aluminium, which has three, because the crystal structure of beryllium is HCP, where aluminium's FCC. So the combination of valence-electrons and crystal structure makes aluminium a better conductor.

I would like to know if there's actually a relation between valence-electrons and electrical conductivity, and what the correct relation is.

From https://www.thoughtco.com/electrical-conductivity-in-metals-2340117

""Transfer of Energy​

The transfer of energy is strongest when there is little resistance. On a billiard table, this occurs when a ball strikes against another single ball, passing most of its energy onto the next ball. If a single ball strikes multiple other balls, each of those will carry only a fraction of the energy.By the same token, the most effective conductors of electricity are metals that have a single valence electron that is free to move and causes a strong repelling reaction in other electrons. This is the case in the most conductive metals, such as silver, gold, and copper. Each has a single valence electron that moves with little resistance and causes a strong repelling reaction.Semiconductor metals (or metalloids) have a higher number of valence electrons (usually four or more). So, although they can conduct electricity, they are inefficient at the task. However, when heated or doped with other elements, semiconductors like silicon and germanium can become extremely efficient conductors of electricity.""

my bolding
cheers
Dave
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Klystron and milkism
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top