Do Virtual Particles Really Exist in Our Universe?

Click For Summary
The existence of virtual particles remains a contentious topic, with many asserting they are merely mathematical tools used in quantum field theory (QFT) rather than real entities. While virtual particles can yield real effects, such as in the Casimir effect, their actual existence is not universally accepted, and alternative explanations exist. Discussions emphasize that interpretations of "real" vary among individuals, complicating consensus on the matter. Some argue that calculations can be performed without invoking virtual particles, though this is not the current standard approach. Ultimately, the debate highlights the distinction between mathematical representations and physical reality in quantum mechanics.
  • #31
Fredrik said:
You won't get a much better answer than what I already gave you in #15. FTL speeds are definitely included in the calculation, but there's no good reason to think that something is actually traveling along the paths in spacetime that contribute to the final result.

is there evidence or proof for the existence of virtual particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Rouge72 said:
is there evidence or proof for the existence of virtual particles?

Check out "The universe in a nutshell" by Stephen Hawking. Or just google the "Casimir effect". There have been attempts to measure "vacuum fluctuations", or the "zero point energy", by measuring tiny forces between uncharged metal plates in vacuum. One proposed qualitative, phenomenological explanation of these effects is that they arise because the plates create a cavity, thereby restricting the frequencies of the virtual particles that can pop into existence between them. One can show this more formally using Feynman diagrams with virtual particles, as is done in many texts.

However, it should definitely be noted that alternative explanations of the effect in terms of relativistically retarded van der Waals forces arising from the charged particles moving inside the conductors have also been demonstrated. (see http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503158v1.pdf)

So, while the Casimir effect is consistent with the existence of virtual particles, it evidently does not require them.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K