Do we consider a point in a coordinate system to be a scalar?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A point in a Cartesian coordinate system, such as A (4,5), is not considered a scalar quantity. Scalars are single-valued quantities that do not change under rotation of a coordinate system, while a point represents a specific location defined by its coordinates. The components of point A change with rotation because they are part of a vector representation, which describes the point's position relative to an origin. Thus, the point itself is a zero-dimensional object, distinct from scalars and vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of scalar and vector quantities
  • Familiarity with mathematical concepts of dimensions
  • Basic principles of coordinate transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of scalar fields in physics
  • Study vector representation and transformations in coordinate systems
  • Explore the mathematical definition of points in geometry
  • Learn about the relationship between scalars, vectors, and tensors
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics and physics, educators explaining coordinate systems, and anyone interested in the distinctions between scalars, vectors, and points in geometry.

sams
Gold Member
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
Knowing that a scalar quantity doesn't change under rotation of a coordinate system. Do we consider a point in a Cartesian coordinate system (i.e. A (4,5)) a scalar quantity? If yes, why do the components of point A change under rotation of the coordinate system?
According to my understanding, the point A (4,5) is not considered scalar. Am I right?

Thanks in advance...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sams said:
Knowing that a scalar quantity doesn't change under rotation of a coordinate system. Do we consider a point in a Cartesian coordinate system (i.e. A (4,5)) a scalar quantity? If yes, why do the components of point A change under rotation of the coordinate system?
According to my understanding, the point A (4,5) is not considered scalar. Am I right?

Thanks in advance...
A point is a certain location, here at the coordinates (4,5). We need them to specify it, i.e. to assure that we are talking about the same location. We do this in vector form, that is by its distance and direction from another location which we earlier agreed upon calling the origin. So the description is by a vector, the location itself is not.

As a location, it is neither a vector nor a scalar. A scalar would be a single valued valuation, a number. In case every point has such a valuation, e.g. the temperature, this valuation would be the scalar and the set of all pairs (point , temperature) would be a scalar field. You see, that the point itself isn't called a scalar.

So scalars, vectors, matrices, tensors are what happens at a certain location, they can be evaluated at this location or they are simply attached to this location. Their nature, however, is different from the nature of the point, the location. That's more or less the physical point of view. Mathematically a point is just a zero-dimensional object that has nothing to do with scalars or vectors. It's not even located anywhere as long as we do not make assumption on how to describe it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K