Do you like or dislike reading e-books?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reading
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around preferences for reading e-books versus traditional physical books. Participants share their experiences, opinions, and concerns regarding the usability, comfort, and practicality of e-books in various contexts, including leisure reading and academic use.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a strong dislike for e-books, citing difficulties in navigating references and the discomfort of reading on screens.
  • Others find e-readers like Kindles acceptable, noting features such as e-paper technology that reduces eye strain and the convenience of portability.
  • There are mixed feelings about the effectiveness of e-books for different types of reading; textbooks and scientific materials are often seen as challenging to navigate, while novels may be more suitable.
  • Several participants appreciate the searchability and instant availability of e-books, as well as their lower cost compared to physical books.
  • Some participants emphasize the sensory experience of reading physical books, including the smell and tactile feel, which they feel e-books cannot replicate.
  • There are speculative discussions about future technologies, such as augmented reality glasses and direct brain downloads, which could change the reading experience further.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express a mix of preferences, with no clear consensus on the superiority of e-books versus physical books. Some favor e-books for their convenience, while others strongly prefer traditional books for their sensory qualities and ease of use.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various limitations of e-books, including navigation issues, screen fatigue, and the potential for technology failure. There is also uncertainty regarding the future of reading technologies and their impact on reading habits.

  • #31
Ryan_m_b said:
Regardless that I missed this development I highly doubt the commercial products have any validity. I'll believe it when I see some peer-reviewed research from a credible source showing the validity of the product.

Are you from the UK? If not you may not realize that the Daily Fail is a notoriously bad paper, especially for science. Furthermore the article does not explain what is really going on in the study.

I'm American. That article on synthetic memories was just the first one that popped up in a Google search. Here's the original one I read:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120322161251.htm

For the umteenth time, I am not recommending people zap their brains or suggesting implanting memories whole hog into someone's head is going to happen anytime soon. Some people have no sense of humor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
wuliheron said:
I'm American. That article on synthetic memories was just the first one that popped up in a Google search. Here's the original one I read:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120322161251.htm
Thank you for the article, I look forward to reading it.
wuliheron said:
For the umteenth time, I am not recommending people zap their brains or suggesting implanting memories whole hog into someone's head is going to happen anytime soon. Some people have no sense of humor.
That's a bit harsh. I have a sense of humour but didn't pick up on humour at all in your posts. Apologies for any aggravation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K