- #1
#3 needs to be a pump, not a turbine (otherwise you can't make the water/steam circulate) and the idea glosses over what is actually needed to filter hazardous waste out of the boiler exhaust. Burning the hazardous waste is the last thing you want to do to it. Also, thermoelectrics are really inefficient and expensive, so I wouldn't bother with that part.Chris1984 said:Some people say it's ambitious, some people say it's crazy and some people say it just won't work. What do you think?
russ_watters said:#3 needs to be a pump, not a turbine (otherwise you can't make the water/steam circulate) and the idea glosses over what is actually needed to filter hazardous waste out of the boiler exhaust. Burning the hazardous waste is the last thing you want to do to it. Also, thermoelectrics are really inefficient and expensive, so I wouldn't bother with that part.
Also, I don't see what the "bootstrap/gas turbine" is doing.
If you use gravity to spin the turbine, you end up with water at the bottom of the boiler at very low pressure. You need something to generate the high pressure to spin the turbine at the top of the boiler. That something is a pump. I suppose you could use a pump to pressurize the feedwater from the waste, but then you are just using a pump to spin a turbine, which is pointless.Chris1984 said:The idea of #3 as a water turbine at the base of the Water boiler/heater is that it will generate some electricity via gravity and pressure feeding/regulating heated water into the the incineration chamber for super heating, eventually reaching super-critical levels.
If you intend to use the heat of the boiler to drive a steam cycle, it doesn't make any sense to also power a gas turbine -- one will be better than the other, so only use the better one, since you can't use the same energy twice.As for the bootstrap, it is in essence a self-sustaining system that takes advantage of the temperature differential with a turbine and compressor to heat a larger volume of water, it will be governed by a Gas Turbine Engine (GTE) for control and start-up assitance.
russ_watters said:If you use gravity to spin the turbine, you end up with water at the bottom of the boiler at very low pressure. You need something to generate the high pressure to spin the turbine at the top of the boiler. That something is a pump. I suppose you could use a pump to pressurize the feedwater from the waste, but then you are just using a pump to spin a turbine, which is pointless.
If you attach values to the pressure it will become more clear (they are more important than the temperatures, which actually tend to follow from the pressures).
If you intend to use the heat of the boiler to drive a steam cycle, it doesn't make any sense to also power a gas turbine -- one will be better than the other, so only use the better one, since you can't use the same energy twice.
The boiler tube is just a tube; the pressure doesn't change from the bottom to the top except for the head (which means it is even lower at the top).Chris1984 said:The head of pressure at the height of the boiler will be quite significant considering that super-critical vapour will be directed to the top of the boiler once it has passed through the incineration chamber.
...using the boiler as the source of the energy.As for the bootstrap, it will be self-sustaining. Hot air rises and becomes less dense, it will pass through a compressor where it cools and becomes more dense before passing through a turbine, then repeating the same process all in a closed system with the compressor and turbine rotating on the same spool and governed by the Gas Turbine Engine (GTE).
The "boiler" is the place where water boils: that's the thing on the right, not the thing on the left. In either case, yes, you are using the energy from the boiler to preheat the feed water, while siphoning some off to drive another turbine. Again: unnecessarily complicated since you can only use the energy once.In this process, there is an obivious transfer of heat from the incineration chamber to the water boiler.
Unlikely. This is something you should be able to develop better as part of an introductory thermodynamics class. No need for a grant.I agree that further values need to be supplied, perhaps if a government wants to grant a subsidy? :-)
What is your background, are you a thermo or power-plant engineer? You seem to be getting mixed up here, just so I can provide you with a more simple explanation. You do understand the laws of thermodynamics right?russ_watters said:The boiler tube is just a tube; the pressure doesn't change from the bottom to the top except for the head (which means it is even lower at the top).
...using the boiler as the source of the energy.
The "boiler" is the place where water boils: that's the thing on the right, not the thing on the left. In either case, yes, you are using the energy from the boiler to preheat the feed water, while siphoning some off to drive another turbine. Again: unnecessarily complicated since you can only use the energy once.
Unlikely. This is something you should be able to develop better as part of an introductory thermodynamics class. No need for a grant.
I'm a mechanical engineer, specializing in HVAC. What is your background?Chris1984 said:What is your background, are you a thermo or power-plant engineer? ...You do understand the laws of thermodynamics right?
I don't think so.You seem to be getting mixed up here...
Your explanation is already too simple: you need to develop it further with more details*. That's what is tripping you up. However, one simple principle: do you recognize that a boiler does not increase the pressure of the working fluid that flows through it?...just so I can provide you with a more simple explanation.
russ_watters said:I'm a mechanical engineer, specializing in HVAC. What is your background?
I don't think so.
Your explanation is already too simple: you need to develop it further with more details. That's what is tripping you up. However, one simple principle: do you recognize that a boiler does not increase the pressure of the working fluid that flows through it?
russ_watters said:I'm a mechanical engineer, specializing in HVAC. What is your background?
I don't think so.
Your explanation is already too simple: you need to develop it further with more details. That's what is tripping you up. However, one simple principle: do you recognize that a boiler does not increase the pressure of the working fluid that flows through it?
I don't think it is very difficult and yes, as drawn, at least your primary cycle will not work. There is nothing in the cycle that can generate pressure to drive the cycle.Chris1984 said:I agree further details are needed, however surely as an engineer you would recognize the challenge in doing the math for such an integrated waste-to-energy plant design. Are you saying this will not work?
I'm sorry, but that just isn't the case. With only gravity available, the pressure is highest at the bottom and lowest at the top. It does not increase as the water/steam flows up through the boiler (the thing on the right).The pressure, density and temperature relationship of water and its transition to a vapour in such a system indicates that high pressure will build towards the top of the water boiler (the blue thing on the left) once the water has been feed into the incineration chamber and reached super-critical vapour.
Sorry, I but that just isn't the case. Third year mechanical engineers can analyze multi/combined-cycle thermodynamic plants.Your comments about an undergrad in thermodynamics being able to do the math for such a design is amusing. 3rd year Mech students design little fans and wheels, not waste-to-energy plants
russ_watters said:I don't think it is very difficult and yes, as drawn, at least your primary cycle will not work. There is nothing in the cycle that can generate pressure to drive the cycle.
I'm sorry, but that just isn't the case. With only gravity available, the pressure is highest at the bottom and lowest at the top. It does not increase as the water/steam flows up through the boiler (the thing on the right).
Sorry, I but that just isn't the case. Third year mechanical engineers can analyze multi/combined-cycle thermodynamic plants.
At this point, I'm going to need to insist on making this thread more rigorous. This isn't a place for pissing matches. Please provide the details of your primary cycle; the states/process and the pressure/temperature at each. Do you know the four states/processes of a Rankine cycle?
By the principle of hydrostatic pressure, the pressure at the bottom of the water tank is higher than the pressure at the top:Chris1984 said:The pressure in the boiler (the blue thing on the left), will naturally have a higher pressure towards to top end of the boiler as much more heat is concentrated there. Heat rises doesn't it?
Fair enough; Thread locked. If you change your mind and want help, PM me with more details and I'll re-open the thread so we can analyze them. I suggest, however, you start simpler with learning some of the basic principles of physics and thermodynamics.Insist on what you like, however I will not be presenting the math on here. I am confident it works.
A waste-to-energy plant is designed to convert solid waste, such as garbage and sewage, into usable energy. This helps reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills and also provides a renewable source of energy.
Waste-to-energy plants use various processes, such as incineration, gasification, and anaerobic digestion, to break down and combust waste materials. The resulting heat is then used to generate electricity or steam, which can be used for heating or other purposes.
Waste-to-energy plants can help reduce the volume of waste sent to landfills, which can help mitigate the negative impacts of landfills on the environment and public health. They also provide a source of renewable energy and can reduce the reliance on non-renewable fossil fuels.
Some concerns with waste-to-energy plants include air pollution from the combustion of waste materials, as well as the potential for toxic emissions. There are also concerns about the sustainability and efficiency of waste-to-energy processes compared to other renewable energy sources.
To ensure the success of a waste-to-energy plant, it is important to carefully consider the location, design, and technology used. Adequate regulations and monitoring should also be in place to ensure proper waste management and mitigate any potential negative impacts on the environment and public health.