Does a Fourier transform exist for this (smooth) f.?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Fourier transform of the function \( e^{-x^2}\cos(e^{x^2}) \) does not have a known closed form, as confirmed by discussions among users familiar with advanced mathematical concepts. The function is continuously differentiable across all real numbers and approaches zero at infinity, although its derivative becomes unbounded. Given that Mathematica lacks an algorithm to compute this transform, it is unlikely that a simple solution exists.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with complex functions and their behavior
  • Knowledge of Mathematica software and its capabilities
  • Basic concepts of calculus, particularly differentiation and limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Fourier transforms for non-standard functions
  • Explore advanced techniques in complex analysis relevant to Fourier transforms
  • Learn about the limitations of computational tools like Mathematica in handling specific mathematical problems
  • Investigate alternative methods for approximating Fourier transforms of complex functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers interested in advanced Fourier analysis, as well as users of Mathematica seeking to understand its limitations in handling complex functions.

rachmaninoff
[tex]e^{-x^2}\cos \left( e^{x^2} \right)[/tex]

Mathematica doesn't have an algorithm for it, does a closed form exist for the Fourier transform? It's continuously differentiable on all intervals in R, and it converges to zero at the infinities (the derivative blows up there).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rachmaninoff said:
[tex]e^{-x^2}\cos \left( e^{x^2} \right)[/tex]

Mathematica doesn't have an algorithm for it, does a closed form exist for the Fourier transform? It's continuously differentiable on all intervals in R, and it converges to zero at the infinities (the derivative blows up there).
Well after looking at it for a few minutes on paper, I'd say I certainly doubt you'll get anything nice out of that. Also if Mathematica can't do it, I doubt I'll find an answer as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K