Does a physics background combine better with ME or EE industry jobs?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the compatibility of a physics background with careers in electrical engineering (EE) and mechanical engineering (ME) within the context of industry jobs in America. Participants consider the implications of combining physics with either engineering discipline, discussing job prospects, educational overlaps, and practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that a physics background may not significantly enhance job prospects in EE or ME, suggesting that employers prioritize engineering degrees over physics.
  • Others propose that certain fields, like nanoelectronics engineering, could benefit from a physics background due to the relevance of quantum physics and statistical mechanics.
  • A participant describes their experience in designing medical devices, noting that both ME and EE concepts are valuable, but the applicability may vary depending on specific roles.
  • Concerns are raised about the steep learning curve in transitioning from theory to practice in both engineering fields, with some emphasizing the importance of practical skills gained in physics programs.
  • Disagreements arise regarding the assertion that physics is purely theoretical and engineering is practical, with some participants arguing that engineering fields also utilize physics principles extensively.
  • Several participants share personal experiences, highlighting the differences in educational backgrounds and the skills they found useful in their respective careers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the value of a physics background in relation to EE and ME careers. While some agree that personal interests should guide the choice between the two fields, others emphasize the potential for physics to provide relevant skills in specific engineering contexts. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the broad nature of both ME and EE fields, suggesting that the differences between them may be overshadowed by the practical skills required in industry. There are also references to the varying educational experiences and the applicability of physics knowledge in different engineering roles.

  • #31
I didn't ignore it. I agree. My research was far more useful than classes. But it was nothing like a real internship.

I'm sure its not like this everywhere, but at my current university there is something stopping physics grads from seeking out internships through the university. The engineering internships are open to engineering majors only, and they are very competitive. That is the way almost all companies want to get their interns. I have asked many of the regional employers if they take interns any other way and they don't.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
The practical skills I learned during my physics program were largely learned outside of the classroom or more precisely: by not following course syllabi to the letter (ie: actually building amps or simulating them in SPICE or similar to check if your solutions to exercises are sensible). A physics program is designed to prepare you for physics research, the barebones subjects enable you to do this, along with practical skills like basic numerical programming and latex typesetting (which may or may not come in the form of classes). This is 99% of what you do in a physics bachelors and is not immediately useful for an engineering-type job, apparently.

When you have a degree X and want to work in a field Y, you will always be fighting an uphill battle, no matter how similar they are. With the pervasiveness of HR filters these days you are unlikely to even be called for an interview even if you really do have relevant experience in a very applied subject like transmission lines, image processing in IDL, or fluid dynamics. This has been my (uneventful) job-hunting experience.

So what I'm saying to the OP is basically: your physics background will at best have a neutral effect on your employment prospects for technical jobs. If engineering is your main major, this should not be of any concern.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
957
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K