Does a physics background combine better with ME or EE industry jobs?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relevance of a physics background in securing jobs within the Electrical Engineering (EE) and Mechanical Engineering (ME) fields in America. Participants assert that while both EE and ME have their unique approaches, a physics degree does not significantly enhance job prospects in either field. The consensus is that candidates should choose their engineering discipline based on personal interest rather than perceived advantages of combining it with physics. Specific roles, such as process engineering in the semiconductor industry, do value physics knowledge, but overall, employers prioritize engineering degrees over physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Electrical Engineering (EE) principles
  • Familiarity with Mechanical Engineering (ME) concepts
  • Knowledge of semiconductor industry practices
  • Awareness of process engineering roles and responsibilities
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of physics in nanoelectronics engineering
  • Explore process engineering job descriptions at companies like Intel
  • Investigate the differences in curriculum between physics and engineering degrees
  • Learn about the practical applications of physics in various engineering fields
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students considering a dual major in physics and engineering, recent graduates evaluating their career options, and professionals in the semiconductor industry seeking insights on the applicability of their physics background in engineering roles.

  • #31
I didn't ignore it. I agree. My research was far more useful than classes. But it was nothing like a real internship.

I'm sure its not like this everywhere, but at my current university there is something stopping physics grads from seeking out internships through the university. The engineering internships are open to engineering majors only, and they are very competitive. That is the way almost all companies want to get their interns. I have asked many of the regional employers if they take interns any other way and they don't.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
The practical skills I learned during my physics program were largely learned outside of the classroom or more precisely: by not following course syllabi to the letter (ie: actually building amps or simulating them in SPICE or similar to check if your solutions to exercises are sensible). A physics program is designed to prepare you for physics research, the barebones subjects enable you to do this, along with practical skills like basic numerical programming and latex typesetting (which may or may not come in the form of classes). This is 99% of what you do in a physics bachelors and is not immediately useful for an engineering-type job, apparently.

When you have a degree X and want to work in a field Y, you will always be fighting an uphill battle, no matter how similar they are. With the pervasiveness of HR filters these days you are unlikely to even be called for an interview even if you really do have relevant experience in a very applied subject like transmission lines, image processing in IDL, or fluid dynamics. This has been my (uneventful) job-hunting experience.

So what I'm saying to the OP is basically: your physics background will at best have a neutral effect on your employment prospects for technical jobs. If engineering is your main major, this should not be of any concern.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K