Does a Smallest Real Number Exist for a Given Real Number?

Click For Summary
There is no smallest positive real number, as any candidate can be halved to yield a smaller positive number, leading to a contradiction. This reasoning also applies to positive rational numbers, confirming that no smallest positive rational number exists. For any given real number x, there cannot be a smallest real number y that is greater than x, as one can always find a number z between x and y. The argument illustrates that for any assumed smallest y, a smaller number z can be constructed. Thus, the conclusion is that no smallest real number exists in relation to any given real number.
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


(1) Prove that there exists no smallest positive real number. (2) Does there exist a
smallest positive rational number? (3) Given a real number x, does there exist a
smallest real number y > x?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


(1) Suppose that ##a## is the smallest real number. Define ##b = \frac{a}{2}##. Then ##0<b<a##, which is a contradiction. Hence, there exists no smallest positive real number.
(2) Since the rationals are a subfield of the reals, the argument above applies here as well.
(3) Let ##x## be an arbitrary positive real number. Suppose that ##y## is the smallest real number such that ##y>x##. Define ##z = x + \frac{y-x}{2}##. Then we have the chain that ##x < z < y##. ##x < z## because ##x < x + \frac{y-x}{2} \rightarrow y > x##, which was assumed to be true, and likewise ##z< y \rightarrow y > x##, which was assumed to be true. In the case that y < x < 0, then just define ##z = -x - \frac{y-x}{2}## and the same result follows. Hence, there does not exist a smallest real number in relation to another real number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good.

(3) could be made shorter by using the result from (1). Just show that if y is the smallest real number > x then (y-x) is the smallest positive real number.
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Davis 97
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
909
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K