Does Adding a Constant to the Hamiltonian Affect Quantum System Dynamics?

Click For Summary
Adding a constant to the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics does not alter the physical dynamics of the system. In the Schrödinger representation, it results in a uniform phase shift across all states, which does not affect observable outcomes. Similarly, in the Heisenberg representation, the evolution of operators remains unchanged since constants commute with the Hamiltonian. This contrasts with classical mechanics, where the zero reference energy is arbitrary and does not influence forces. Thus, while the frequency of the wavefunction may shift, the fundamental behavior of the quantum system remains unaffected.
MadRocketSci2
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
So, I was reading about the exchange interaction, and trying to work out what it referred to, and came across something strange in the treatment of the hydrogen molecule (I think it was on wikipedia):

The hamiltonian given for the system included a term e2/(4πε0 * Rab) for the repulsion between nuclei a and b, even though the wave equation was only for the motion of the electrons, and the nuclei are treated as fixed.

In classical physics, you can add a constant to the hamiltonian, and it doesn't change the physical picture of what is being described. It doesn't matter where zero reference energy is, in terms of the forces on the system.

In wave-mechanics, however, adding a constant to the hamiltonian does shift the frequency of the wavefunction, if not the spatial form of the stationary states. This leads me to wonder about the equivalence of the physical picture for non-stationary states. (time varying states, transient states when the electron cloud is in transition between two energy levels, behavior of free particles, etc.)

(Thinking back to optics:) If you have something like a beam focusing down to a focus point, then diverging - the minimum spot size for a given initial aperture is very much dependent on the wavelength, and here the wavelength seems to be dependent on this reference energy that (at least in classical mechanics) should be arbitrary.

So: Do these constant terms added to the hamiltonian, and shifted frequencies change the system physically? (ie, the way the squared magnitude of the wavefunction moves around, Pauli velocities/currents, etc)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer to your question is "no".

If you are using the Schrödinger representation, where the states evolve, it would simply correspond to adding an additional (and equal) time dependent phase to all states and only phase differences are relevant.

If you are using the Heisenberg representation, where operators evolve, the evolution is given by the commutator of the operator and the Hamiltonian. Since anything commutes with a constant (something proportional to the identity operator), adding a constant does not change the evolution of operators.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K