Does Adjusting the Index Affect the Convergence of an Infinite Series?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence or divergence of an infinite series defined as the sum of (k^2 - 1) / (3k^4 + 1) from k=0. Participants are also exploring the evaluation of a limit involving t as it approaches infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering the limit comparison test and questioning its applicability due to the presence of negative terms. There is discussion about whether the starting index of summation can be adjusted without affecting convergence.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights regarding the limit comparison test and the implications of negative terms in the series. Others are questioning the relationship between the terms of the series and the comparison series, indicating a lack of consensus on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the validity of applying the limit comparison test due to the negative first term of the series. Additionally, participants are discussing the implications of changing the lower index of summation in relation to convergence.

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
1) Determine whether the infinite series

Sigma (k^2-1) / (3k^4 + 1)
k=0
converges or diverges.


[My immediate thought was to use the "limit comparsion test", but this test requires all terms to be positive. However, the first term (put k=0) is definitely negative...what should I do? Can I still use the limit comparsion test, and if not, what other tests can I use?]


2) Evaluate
lim [t^2 - t^3 sin(1/t)]
t->∞


[When I direct substitute, I get ∞-∞*0, and I have no clue how to solve this problem...any hints?]


Thank you for your help!:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
let [tex]a_{n} = \frac{k^2 - 1}{3k^4 + 1}[/tex]
and [tex]b_{n} = \frac{1}{k^2}[/tex]
then show that [tex]a_{n} > b_{n}[/tex] for every n

Okay, I finally got it...
 
Last edited:
But if an>bn and bn converges, it tells you nothing whether an converges or not...how does that help?
And also, it doesn't look very straight foward to me to prove that an>bn
 
1) Also, I am still wondering whether I can apply "limit comparsion test" to this problem or not...does anyone know?

Thanks!
 
[My immediate thought was to use the "limit comparsion test", but this test requires all terms to be positive.

This is where convergence is beautiful. It doesn't matter if the first term is negative; just look at the sum

term one + series starting from term two.

Clearly this sum exists iff your original series converges (if that's not obvious, prove it)

BTW, I think [tex]a_n<b_n[/tex] as posted above, because [tex]a_n[/tex] approximates [tex]\frac{1}{3k^2}[/tex]

(in fact, it's always less than that... you should be able to show that too)
 
So when I am trying to see whether an infinite series converges or diverges, I can always change the lower index of summation whenever I want?

an approximates 1/3k^2, but how can I know which one is larger?

Thanks!
 
kingwinner said:
So when I am trying to see whether an infinite series converges or diverges, I can always change the lower index of summation whenever I want?

That's right; convergence or divergence of a series is independent or the starting index.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K