Does anyone do this type of Aerospace Research?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the pursuit of advanced research in aerospace engineering, specifically focusing on the physics of flight, lift, and drag on wings. The participant, holding an M.S. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, seeks to explore the inverse problem of determining airfoil shapes based on desired aerodynamic forces. They inquire about existing research opportunities and relevant academic institutions, highlighting resources from NACA and NASA. The conversation emphasizes the significance of the Navier-Stokes equations in understanding fluid dynamics and their application in aerospace research.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with aerodynamic forces such as lift (Cl) and drag (Cd)
  • Knowledge of the Navier-Stokes equations and their implications
  • Experience with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the inverse design methods in aerodynamics
  • Explore the latest findings on the Navier-Stokes equations
  • Investigate graduate programs focusing on aerospace engineering research
  • Review publications from NACA and NASA on wing design
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, graduate students in mechanical engineering, researchers interested in fluid dynamics, and professionals seeking to advance their knowledge in aerodynamic design.

rm446
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hello

I currently hold a M.S. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and a B.S. in Mechanical engineering (note the M.S. had an emphasis in controls and dynamics). I got my M.S. by only taking grad courses and have done no research or advanced project, I graduated last year and have been working in a terribly boring engineering job ever since.

Lately I've be thinking about going back to grad school but I want to have a clear research focus in mind before I consider anything else.

One thing I've always been interested in is the physics of flight, particularly the phenomenon that cause lift and drag on a wing. I've always felt the way they taught fluid dynamics was a little bit of a cop-out though, I mean the build a cool equation and then say, "but alas it's is not analytically solvable, so here's how to get a numerical solution". So you can always start with airfoil and plug it into a program to figure out it's forces more or less.

I'm wondering is there any research related to doing the reverse, to starting with air flow and how you want the forces to be and calculating the shape of the airfoil? Or finding an analytical relationship between the shape of a wing and it's shape factors Cl and Cd? Anyways is this just a pipe dream or does anyone know of any universities/professors/labs that to research on this kind of thing?

Thank you for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There has been a lot of research on wing and aircraft design over the last century. There are many reports from NACA (1915-1958), then NASA (1958-present).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_airfoil

I would recommend browsing the AIAA website - www.aiaa.org

NASA Langley - http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/aeronautics/index.html

NASA Dryden - http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/research/index.html

Then again, this might be of interest - http://www.claymath.org/millennium/Navier-Stokes_Equations/
Waves follow our boat as we meander across the lake, and turbulent air currents follow our flight in a modern jet. Mathematicians and physicists believe that an explanation for and the prediction of both the breeze and the turbulence can be found through an understanding of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Although these equations were written down in the 19th Century, our understanding of them remains minimal. The challenge is to make substantial progress toward a mathematical theory which will unlock the secrets hidden in the Navier-Stokes equations.
The key is to understand a set of coupled non-linear PDEs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K