A Does anyone recognize this equation?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter ElliotSmith
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation in question appears to relate to the summation of all divisors d of k, potentially linked to the Möbius Inversion function. It is suggested that if n is a power of a prime number, the equation's right side corresponds to the count of monic irreducible polynomials of degree k over a finite field with n elements. This connection is further explored in the context of algebraic number theory. The discussion emphasizes the mathematical significance of the equation and its applications. Understanding this equation could enhance insights into number theory and polynomial structures.
ElliotSmith
Messages
167
Reaction score
104
TL;DR Summary
Does anyone recognize this equation? Which branch of mathematics is it?
Does anyone recognize this equation?

Which branch of mathematics is it from?
 

Attachments

  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    18 KB · Views: 148
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It seems summation for all the divisors d of k.
 
If n is the power of a prime number, then the right side of the equation equals the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree k over the finite field with n elements. See the section on Algebraic number theory in this Wikipedia article and the cited reference.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top