How are mathematical ideas discovered

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fascheue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ideas Mathematical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of mathematical discovery and invention, particularly in the context of solving equations like quadratic equations. Participants explore how mathematical techniques are developed and the processes involved in approaching new problems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Philosophical
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the process of solving quadratic equations by recognizing their form and applying known techniques, questioning how these methods were originally discovered.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of building on existing knowledge, referencing Bernard of Chartres' idea that modern thinkers stand on the shoulders of giants.
  • A different perspective suggests that discovering how to approach new problems can be significantly more challenging than applying established methods, with varying levels of difficulty depending on the problem type.
  • One participant notes that insights can sometimes come suddenly, likening it to the invention of the wheel in a civilization that had never conceived of it.
  • A philosophical question is raised about whether mathematical ideas are discovered or invented, leading to a discussion about the implications of labeling mathematical concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether mathematical ideas are discovered or invented, indicating a lack of consensus on this philosophical question. The discussion also highlights varying opinions on the processes of mathematical problem-solving and discovery.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on philosophical implications of mathematical development, but does not resolve the question of whether mathematical ideas are inherently discovered or invented. The complexity of problem-solving approaches, especially for different types of equations, remains an open topic.

Fascheue
If I need to solve the equation x^2 + x = 5, I can recognize that it’s a quadratic equation, change it to x^2 + x - 5 = 0, and then plug into the quadratic formula. In general the way that math is taught, I recognize what type of problem it is, then use the techniques that I was told to use to solve that sort of problem.

How though did people figure out this sort of stuff? If I was given that same equation, but didn’t yet know how to solve quadratic equations, I’m not even sure where one would begin to try to solve it or to find some way to solve it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fascheue said:
If I need to solve the equation x^2 + x = 5, I can recognize that it’s a quadratic equation, change it to x^2 + x - 5 = 0, and then plug into the quadratic formula. In general the way that math is taught, I recognize what type of problem it is, then use the techniques that I was told to use to solve that sort of problem.

How though did people figure out this sort of stuff? If I was given that same equation, but didn’t yet know how to solve quadratic equations, I’m not even sure where one would begin to try to solve it or to find some way to solve it.
They rely on what is already known.
Bernard of Chartres used to say that we [the Moderns] are like dwarves perched on the shoulders of giants [the Ancients], and thus we are able to see more and farther than the latter.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton

It is often along this important pattern:
  1. Pose the question as precise as possible.
  2. List what you already have in the context.
  3. Try to figure out a path from 2. to 1.
In the case you've mentioned, it is: We want to know the roots of ##x^2+x-5##. We already know, that ##(a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2##. Now we simply try to get from one to the other:
$$
x^2+x-5=x^2+2\cdot x \cdot \dfrac{1}{2} + \left( \dfrac{1}{2} \right)^2 - \left( \dfrac{1}{2} \right)^2 -5 = \left( x + \dfrac{1}{2} \right)^2 - \dfrac{11}{2}
$$
 
Discovering how to approach a new type of problem is typically much more difficult than applying an approach that has been found before. Sometimes it is easy to reduce the new problem to a known one (e.g. the first step you made in your post), sometimes it is much more difficult.

How to approach it: try different steps that change the problem to different forms until you find one that is easier to solve. With the quadratic equations this is typically done in class to see where the formula comes from. With cubic functions it gets much more complicated. Wikipedia has a description. Hundreds of things were tried, a few of them worked.
 
Sometimes such problems take a flash of insight or the perspective of a genius. As an old saying goes, if you had been born into a civilization where the wheel had not been invented, you probably wouldn't have thought of it either.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
First of all are mathematical ideas discovered or invented ?

Ssnow
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
Ssnow said:
First of all are mathematical ideas discovered or invented ?

Ssnow
This is a purely philosophical question and has been discussed on PF several times before, most recently here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...onsidered-a-discovery-or-an-invention.924120/

In addition it leads to a different topic, because how to develop mathematical ideas - the OP's question - does not mean, how to label mathematical ideas. And this is it: invention or discovery is only a label and a question of taste and philosophical schools.

Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K