Does back pressure give incorrect flow reading?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of back pressure on flow readings in digital peak flow meters, specifically comparing two models with different constrictions. It is established that the airflow sensor is not located within the constriction but rather at the nozzles on either side. The equation for converting differential pressure to flow rate is provided, highlighting the importance of the nozzle coefficient in real-world applications. The findings indicate that smaller constrictions yield higher flow rates due to increased velocity and pressure differentials, necessitating precise calibration for accurate measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with differential pressure measurement techniques
  • Knowledge of flow rate calculation formulas
  • Experience with nozzle design and calibration methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of nozzle coefficients in flow measurement accuracy
  • Learn about advanced fluid dynamics concepts related to flow constriction
  • Explore calibration techniques for flow testing systems
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on flow rate measurements
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid dynamics specialists, and anyone involved in the design and calibration of flow measurement devices will benefit from this discussion.

CadisEtramaDiRaizel
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have to build a digital peak flow meter. I have two models based on calculations ( ideal). I have noticed that the flow rate on the model with a tighter constriction has a greater value than that of a much broader constriction. While testing it out, i noticed air resistance from the first model ( tighter). The second one has almost no resistance. So, does back pressure give an incorrect reading>
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is the airflow sensor in the constriction?
 
CWatters said:
Is the airflow sensor in the constriction?

No, it is attached to nozzles present on each side of the constriction.
Untitled1.png
 
Fluid dynamics isn't my subject but...

How do you convert differential pressure to flow rate?

If two devices with different constrictions give different results that suggests to me the possibility of an error in the way the conversion is done.
 
CWatters said:
Fluid dynamics isn't my subject but...

How do you convert differential pressure to flow rate?

If two devices with different constrictions give different results that suggests to me the possibility of an error in the way the conversion is done.
flow = a2*sqrt(2*ΔP/(density*(1-pow((a2/a1),2))));

where Q is the flowrate, ΔP is the pressure difference between the two nozzles, A1 and A2 the outer and inner diameters respectively, and ρ the density.

A higher reading was observed with a smaller constriction.
 
First, the above equation is clearly only for a theoretically ideal nozzle because the one factor absolutely mandatory in every real world application flow measurement nozzle equation is the nozzle coefficient (actual measured vs ideal) of each nozzle's particular design.

As to your original question, the smaller the second section diameter the higher the velocity in that section and greater the differential between the velocity in the two sections; therefore, the greater static pressure differential as well. The "a2/a1" factor in the equation varies correspondingly to normalize the measurement between the two flow velocity conditions.

With regard to relative accuracy, the effects on flow of a given nozzle design can affect the flow and pressure differential of that nozzle, for example, flow necking at the small diameter entrance, and as a result nozzle designs can not be scaled based strictly on a given configuration, the actual nozzle coefficient for each nozzle design must be established by flow testing in a calibrated flow testing system of that individual nozzle design, including its entry and small areas ratio.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
992
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K