The discussion revolves around whether mathematics should be classified as a science. Participants explore the definitions of science, the methodologies of mathematics and science, and the philosophical implications of these classifications. The conversation includes theoretical perspectives and personal interpretations of the nature of mathematics and its relationship to reality.
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether mathematics should be classified as a science. Multiple competing views are presented, with ongoing debate about the definitions and implications of such classifications.
Definitions of "science" vary among participants, leading to differing conclusions about the classification of mathematics. The discussion reflects a range of philosophical perspectives, including realism and idealism, which influence participants' views on the relationship between mathematics and reality.
Tom Gilroy said:Certainly if computer science is a science, then mathematics must also qualify.
Indeed. I mean, who came up with "Political Science" anyways. That makes no sense. In my opinion, whoever thought that up needs a smack. Hard.CRGreathouse said:There's truth to the adage: "Anything that calls itself a science, isn't a science."
symbolipoint said:Unroductive Arguments! More than one kind of science exist. Life/Biological Sciences, Behavioral Sciences, ... some method should exist for classifying computer fields and mathematics as whatever classification of sciences they are.
If Mathematics is a science, then is it more useful than if it were not?
If Mathematics is not a science, then is it less useful than if it were?
Is it any less or more important just because it may or may not be a science?
Many things we do relate to various Mathematics, and the relevant Mathematics helps to understand those "many things...". Same with many things which we may study.