I Does Current Density Decay to Zero at Vortex Centers in 2D Systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Decay
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of the current density vector, ##\vec J##, in a 2D physical problem, which is non-zero everywhere except at specific points. It is suggested that ##\vec J## decays to zero as it approaches the centers of vortices, where the current density is assumed to vanish. The implications for the magnetic field are also considered, with the assumption that it similarly decays to zero at the vortices due to the absence of current. The conversation seeks further clarification on the expressions and visual representations related to these phenomena. Overall, the relationship between current density and magnetic field behavior in the context of vortices is a central focus.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,930
Reaction score
280
Hello, I have derived an expression for ##\vec J## in a particular, unusual physical problem in 2D. The expression is different from ##\vec 0## everwhere in the material except at at least two different points.

Can I conclude that the only way for this to occur is that ##\vec J## itself decays to ##\vec 0## the closer it gets to the center of the vortices? I assume that the current density vanishes exactly at the center of vortices of currents.

Also, what can I conclude about the magnetic field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would you be able to share the expression or perhaps have an image?

I would assume that the magnetic field decays to zero since at those vortices the current goes to zero.
 
Thread 'The rocket equation, one more time'
I already posted a similar thread a while ago, but this time I want to focus exclusively on one single point that is still not clear to me. I just came across this problem again in Modern Classical Mechanics by Helliwell and Sahakian. Their setup is exactly identical to the one that Taylor uses in Classical Mechanics: a rocket has mass m and velocity v at time t. At time ##t+\Delta t## it has (according to the textbooks) velocity ##v + \Delta v## and mass ##m+\Delta m##. Why not ##m -...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 236 ·
8
Replies
236
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
900
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K