Magnetostatics - Magnetic field of a nonuniform current slab

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the magnetic field generated by a thick slab with a non-uniform current density described by \(\vec{J} = Jz\hat{x}\). The slab extends from \(0 \leq z \leq a\) and is infinite in the \(xy\) plane. Participants are exploring the implications of the current density's non-uniformity on the magnetic field both inside and outside the slab.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using Ampere's Law and the Biot-Savart Law to find the magnetic field, with some questioning the symmetry and the choice of Amperian loops due to the non-uniform current density. Others suggest considering the problem in terms of thin sheets within the slab and integrating the contributions to the magnetic field.

Discussion Status

There are various approaches being explored, including the use of Ampere's Law and the Biot-Savart Law. Some participants have provided suggestions for considering the geometry of the problem and the nature of the current, while others have raised questions about the assumptions being made. No explicit consensus has been reached, but there is a productive exchange of ideas and clarifications.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to clarify the nature of the current density and its implications for the magnetic field. There are discussions about the geometry of the setup and the assumptions regarding the current's direction and distribution.

cmo2978
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thick slab in the region 0 \leq z \leq a, and infinite in xy plane carries a current density \vec{J} = Jz\hat{x}. Find the magnetic field as a function of z, both inside and outside the slab.

Homework Equations


Ampere's Law: \oint \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0 I_{\text{enc}}=\mu_0\int_S\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{a}
Biot-Savart Law: \vec{B}(\vec{r}) = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}I\int_C d\vec{l}'\times\frac{\vec{r}-\vec{r}'}{\left|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'\right|^3}

The Attempt at a Solution


My first approach was to start with the Ampere's Law. If the current density was uniform (\vec{J}=J\hat{x}), by symmetry we would have B=0 at z=\frac{a}{2} and find the magnetic field:
Bl=\mu_0l(z-a/2)J \quad \Rightarrow \quad \vec{B_{\text{in}}} = -\mu_0J(z-a/2)\hat{y}
\dots
In this case though, with a non-uniform current density, I can't see any symmetry or a way to find a proper Amperian loop to use. Am I missing something here?

Next I thought about using Biot-Savart Law,
\vec{B}(\vec{r})\stackrel{?}{=}\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int_V \vec{J}d\tau'\times\frac{\vec{r}-\vec{r}'}{\left|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'\right|^3}
which I think is a bit of a ...stretch, since V is infinite.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suggestion is to use Ampere's law and find ## d \vec{B} ## for each wire of infinite length (as a function of z), that is located at height ## z=z' ##. (Each ## d \vec{B} ## will have x and y components, but no z component). ## \\ ##The current carried by each ## dz ## will be ## dI=Jz \, dz ##. Incidentally, the current is a surface current, so that it is a current density per unit length, and they would have been better to say that surface current per unit length ## \vec{K}=J \, z \, \hat{x} ## , where ## J ## is a constant with units of current/unit area.
 
I suggest considering a thin sheet within the slab, at z=z. Make the x extent of the slab infinite but restrict the y direction to a length = 2L, making L arbitrarily large but finite.

Now consider an amperian loop extending parallel to the sheet in the y direction & wrapping around x = +/- L above and below the sheet. Can you assume ∫B⋅dl = - 2L J dz along the top and 2L J dz along the bottom of the sheet, ignoring ∫B⋅dl along the z direction above to below the sheet at x= + and -L?

Then sum all the thin sheets' B fields by integration.
 
Charles Link said:
(Each ## d \vec{B} ## will have x and y components, but no z component).
The current is traveling along the x direction so no x component of dB.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
rude man said:
The current is traveling along the x direction so no x component of dB.
I got the geometry momentarily confused, but otherwise my comments are applicable.
 
Charles Link said:
I got the geometry momentarily confused, but otherwise my comments are applicable.
I should have assumed a typo anyway.

I agree that J should have been written J = Jz z i
where Jz = constant = dJ/dz and J is the usual current density in amp/m2.

Other than that I'm not sure what your "wire" is. What is its cross-section?

Not trying to be difficult, just trying to help the OP.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K