Does doubling the length of a wire affect power dissipation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Doubling the length of a wire while maintaining a constant voltage and fixed volume results in a significant change in power dissipation, specifically a decrease by 3/4. The resistance of the wire increases due to the reduction in cross-sectional area as the wire is stretched. The relationship between power, voltage, and resistance is governed by the equation P = V²/R, where the changing resistance directly affects power dissipation. The electric field also halves when the length is doubled, reinforcing the conclusion that power dissipation decreases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law and power equations (P = V²/R)
  • Familiarity with concepts of resistance and resistivity in cylindrical conductors
  • Knowledge of electric field (E) and its relationship to voltage (V) and length (L)
  • Basic geometry of cylindrical shapes, including volume and cross-sectional area
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of changing resistance on power dissipation in electrical circuits
  • Learn about the relationship between resistivity, length, and cross-sectional area in conductors
  • Explore the implications of constant voltage in electrical systems and its effect on power
  • Investigate the principles of electric fields in relation to voltage and wire geometry
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, physics students, and professionals involved in circuit design and analysis who seek to understand the impact of wire dimensions on power dissipation.

briteliner
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a wire of resistance r is drawn to double its length. assume a constant voltage and a fixed volume, by how much does the power dissipation change?

Homework Equations



P=LEI
E=V/L
I=V/R

The Attempt at a Solution


so when i plug in 2L for L, it just ends up canceling anyway. the answer in the back of the book says it should decrease by 3/4, so i don't understand how that would happen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about the relation

P = \frac{V^{2}}{R} = \frac{\left(EL\right)^{2}}{R}

How does the voltage change when the length is doubled? Does this help?
 
thanks. ok, so then i plug in 2L and I get 4E2L2/R, then i plug in 2LE/I for R and it becomes 2LIE, but this still would not give me the right answer when subtracting from the Power with L
 
For the initial condition

E_{initial} = \frac{V}{L}

Now, double the length. So,

E_{final} = \frac{V}{2L} \rightarrow E_{final} = \frac{1}{2}E_{initial}

Remember, the voltage is "constant." Does this make sense yet?

EDIT: Whoops. Made a mistake...fixed it. Sorry, my mind isn't working right. Now plug it into the previous relation that I provided for the power and you will see the 3/4 difference.
 
Last edited:
You are both thinking too 1-dimensionally about this problem; let's call the volume of the wire \tau. Assume that it is a cylindrical shape, initially with radius R_i and length L_i, so that \tau=\pi R_i^2L_i. You are told that the volume of the wire remains constant, so what happen to the radius R as the wire is stretched to a length L_f=2L_i?
What does that do the cross-sectional area A=\pi R^2 of the wire?

The resistance r will change as a result of the changing cross-section. Remember, for a cylindrical wire of length L and cross-sectional area A with constant resistivity \rho, the resistance is given by r=\rho \frac{L}{A}.

So, its the change in the resistance due to the changing cross-sectional area of the wire that accounts for the different power dissipations.

Also, you are told to treat V as a constant, so why would you write V=EL and calculate a change in V?

Just use P_i=\frac{V^2}{r_i} and P_f=\frac{V^2}{r_f} to calculate the change in power dissipation P_f-P_i.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Also, you are told to treat V as a constant, so why would you write V=EL and calculate a change in V?

I liked your approach. I didn't consider it since the student had already supplied relevant equations that would get the job done. I don't understand this comment though. The voltage V never changes, since it is constant. If you double the length, the electric field E must be halved to keep V constant. So, the result is the same, but I would say that your approach is better since it takes into account the fixed volume of the wire.
 
buffordboy23 said:
I liked your approach. I didn't consider it since the student had already supplied relevant equations that would get the job done. I don't understand this comment though. The voltage V never changes, since it is constant. If you double the length, the electric field E must be halved to keep V constant. So, the result is the same, but I would say that your approach is better since it takes into account the fixed volume of the wire.

How is the result the same? If you plug in a constant V and r into P=V^2/r you get the same power dissipation. Even if you use your expression involving E and L you get

P_f=\frac{(E_fL_f)^2}{r}=\frac{((\frac{E_i}{2})({2L_i}))^2}{r}=\frac{(E_iL_i)^2}{r}=P_i

Clearly, any change in the dissipated power must come from the changing resistance of the wire.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
How is the result the same? If you plug in a constant V and r into P=V^2/r you get the same power dissipation. Even if you use your expression involving E and L you get

P_f=\frac{(E_fL_f)^2}{r}=\frac{((\frac{E_i}{2})({2L_i}))^2}{r}=\frac{(E_iL_i)^2}{r}=P_i

Clearly, any change in the dissipated power must come from the changing resistance of the wire.

Whoa! You are right. Usually, I don't make such simple mistakes. Sorry for leading you astray Briteliner. I should have kept my mouth shut on this one. =)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K