Does doubling the length of a wire affect power dissipation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a wire of resistance that is drawn to double its length while maintaining a constant voltage and fixed volume. Participants are exploring how this change affects power dissipation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between power, voltage, and resistance, questioning how doubling the length impacts these variables. Some attempt to derive power dissipation using different equations, while others focus on the implications of constant volume on resistance and cross-sectional area.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of different interpretations regarding the effects of changing length and resistance on power dissipation. Some participants offer insights into the relationship between electric field and voltage, while others challenge assumptions about the constancy of voltage and its implications for power calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a fixed volume for the wire and a constant voltage, which leads to discussions about how these conditions affect resistance and power dissipation.

briteliner
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a wire of resistance r is drawn to double its length. assume a constant voltage and a fixed volume, by how much does the power dissipation change?

Homework Equations



P=LEI
E=V/L
I=V/R

The Attempt at a Solution


so when i plug in 2L for L, it just ends up canceling anyway. the answer in the back of the book says it should decrease by 3/4, so i don't understand how that would happen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about the relation

[tex]P = \frac{V^{2}}{R} = \frac{\left(EL\right)^{2}}{R}[/tex]

How does the voltage change when the length is doubled? Does this help?
 
thanks. ok, so then i plug in 2L and I get 4E2L2/R, then i plug in 2LE/I for R and it becomes 2LIE, but this still would not give me the right answer when subtracting from the Power with L
 
For the initial condition

[tex]E_{initial} = \frac{V}{L}[/tex]

Now, double the length. So,

[tex]E_{final} = \frac{V}{2L} \rightarrow E_{final} = \frac{1}{2}E_{initial}[/tex]

Remember, the voltage is "constant." Does this make sense yet?

EDIT: Whoops. Made a mistake...fixed it. Sorry, my mind isn't working right. Now plug it into the previous relation that I provided for the power and you will see the 3/4 difference.
 
Last edited:
You are both thinking too 1-dimensionally about this problem; let's call the volume of the wire [itex]\tau[/itex]. Assume that it is a cylindrical shape, initially with radius [itex]R_i[/itex] and length [itex]L_i[/itex], so that [itex]\tau=\pi R_i^2L_i[/itex]. You are told that the volume of the wire remains constant, so what happen to the radius R as the wire is stretched to a length [itex]L_f=2L_i[/itex]?
What does that do the cross-sectional area [itex]A=\pi R^2[/itex] of the wire?

The resistance [itex]r[/itex] will change as a result of the changing cross-section. Remember, for a cylindrical wire of length [itex]L[/itex] and cross-sectional area [itex]A[/itex] with constant resistivity [itex]\rho[/itex], the resistance is given by [itex]r=\rho \frac{L}{A}[/itex].

So, its the change in the resistance due to the changing cross-sectional area of the wire that accounts for the different power dissipations.

Also, you are told to treat V as a constant, so why would you write V=EL and calculate a change in V?

Just use [itex]P_i=\frac{V^2}{r_i}[/itex] and [itex]P_f=\frac{V^2}{r_f}[/itex] to calculate the change in power dissipation [itex]P_f-P_i[/itex].
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Also, you are told to treat V as a constant, so why would you write V=EL and calculate a change in V?

I liked your approach. I didn't consider it since the student had already supplied relevant equations that would get the job done. I don't understand this comment though. The voltage V never changes, since it is constant. If you double the length, the electric field E must be halved to keep V constant. So, the result is the same, but I would say that your approach is better since it takes into account the fixed volume of the wire.
 
buffordboy23 said:
I liked your approach. I didn't consider it since the student had already supplied relevant equations that would get the job done. I don't understand this comment though. The voltage V never changes, since it is constant. If you double the length, the electric field E must be halved to keep V constant. So, the result is the same, but I would say that your approach is better since it takes into account the fixed volume of the wire.

How is the result the same? If you plug in a constant V and r into P=V^2/r you get the same power dissipation. Even if you use your expression involving E and L you get

[tex]P_f=\frac{(E_fL_f)^2}{r}=\frac{((\frac{E_i}{2})({2L_i}))^2}{r}=\frac{(E_iL_i)^2}{r}=P_i[/tex]

Clearly, any change in the dissipated power must come from the changing resistance of the wire.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
How is the result the same? If you plug in a constant V and r into P=V^2/r you get the same power dissipation. Even if you use your expression involving E and L you get

[tex]P_f=\frac{(E_fL_f)^2}{r}=\frac{((\frac{E_i}{2})({2L_i}))^2}{r}=\frac{(E_iL_i)^2}{r}=P_i[/tex]

Clearly, any change in the dissipated power must come from the changing resistance of the wire.

Whoa! You are right. Usually, I don't make such simple mistakes. Sorry for leading you astray Briteliner. I should have kept my mouth shut on this one. =)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K