Does Equal Cardinality in Nested Infinite Sets Imply Equality Throughout?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 3K views
rideabike
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that if A,B, and C are nonempty sets such that A [itex]\subseteq[/itex] B [itex]\subseteq[/itex] C and |A|=|C|, then |A|=|B|

The Attempt at a Solution


Assume B [itex]\subset[/itex] C and A [itex]\subset[/itex] B (else A=B or B=C), and there must be a bijection f:A[itex]\rightarrow[/itex]C...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rideabike said:

Homework Statement


Prove that if A,B, and C are nonempty sets such that A [itex]\subseteq[/itex] B [itex]\subseteq[/itex] C and |A|=|C|, then |A|=|B|

The Attempt at a Solution


Assume B [itex]\subset[/itex] C and A [itex]\subset[/itex] B (else A=B or B=C), and there must be a bijection f:A[itex]\rightarrow[/itex]C...

So far you are just stating what the problem told you. Don't you have some theorems you might apply?
 
rideabike said:

Homework Statement


Prove that if A,B, and C are nonempty sets such that A [itex]\subseteq[/itex] B [itex]\subseteq[/itex] C and |A|=|C|, then |A|=|B|

The Attempt at a Solution


Assume B [itex]\subset[/itex] C and A [itex]\subset[/itex] B (else A=B or B=C), and there must be a bijection f:A[itex]\rightarrow[/itex]C...

Why not start with the given condition, that A [itex]\subseteq[/itex] B [itex]\subseteq[/itex] C and |A|=|C|?
 
Dick said:
So far you are just stating what the problem told you. Don't you have some theorems you might apply?
I know, I don't really know where to start. Schroder-Bernstein maybe?
 
rideabike said:
I know, I don't really know where to start. Schroder-Bernstein maybe?

That's the one! Try and apply it. Here's a hint. If A is subset of B, then there's an injection from A into B, right?
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
That's the one! Try and apply it. Here's a hint. If A is subset of B, then there's an injection from A into B, right?

Right. And we want to show there's an injection from B to A. Would it be that since there's an injection from B to C and and injection from C to A, there must be an injection from B to A?
 
rideabike said:
Right. And we want to show there's an injection from B to A. Would it be that since there's an injection from B to C and and injection from C to A, there must be an injection from B to A?

Sure. That's wasn't so hard, was it? You might want to spell out some of the details, like what the actual injections are in terms of your bijection f:A->C. But that's the idea.